2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-8172(03)00035-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bengal Fan: morphology, geometry, stratigraphy, history and processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
325
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
325
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bengal fan is the largest submarine fan on the Earth, which is about 3,000 km long and 1,000 km in width 51 . We estimated the sediment velocity scale for the Bengal fan system using sediment continuity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bengal fan is the largest submarine fan on the Earth, which is about 3,000 km long and 1,000 km in width 51 . We estimated the sediment velocity scale for the Bengal fan system using sediment continuity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BOB is also characterized by the presence of one of the largest submarine fans of the world which extends from 20° N to 7° 40' S over a length of 3000 km (Krishna et al, 2001a;Curray et al, 2003). The BOB has received sediments from different sources since the breakup of eastern Gondwanaland (~130 Ma): initially from the Indian peninsular rivers including the Mahanadi, Krishna-Godavari and Cauvery rivers until Oligocene time (Bastia et al, 2010).…”
Section: Regional Geologic Setting and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment cover of the oceanic plate changes dramatically from the northwestern to the southeastern part of the Sunda margin. This is due to the fact that the main sediment supply in this region is derived from the Bengal fan (Curray et al, 2003). With less sediment supply in larger distance to the fan, the size of the accretionary prism decreases steadily to the southeast, so that the Java Trench does not contain any sediment fill along extensive distances (Kopp et al, 2006).…”
Section: Landslide Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%