2008
DOI: 10.1086/mre.23.1.42629601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Benefits of Rationalization: The Case of the American Lobster Fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model fits the data well and both coefficients are significant at 1% level. Estimates (Table 1) appear to be similar to those found in the literature (French McCay et al 2003;Steinback et al 2008). However, unlike others, this methodology does not use individual weight data.…”
Section: Estimation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model fits the data well and both coefficients are significant at 1% level. Estimates (Table 1) appear to be similar to those found in the literature (French McCay et al 2003;Steinback et al 2008). However, unlike others, this methodology does not use individual weight data.…”
Section: Estimation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Estimates for the American lobster weight-length relationship can be found in the scientific literature (e.g., French McCay et al 2003;Steinback et al 2008). French McCay et al use data from individual weight and carapace length of lobsters collected by research trawls in Rhode Island estimating the weightlength relationship to be W ¼ 0:001143L 2:934 for the whole lobster population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative allometry, i.e., a decreasing growth rate of TL vs. CL and CL vs. W for both sexes, reflects a morphological change from an elongated body towards a heavier one, as also reported by Martínez-Calderón et al [34] for the Caribbean spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) and Radhakrishnan et al [87] for Panulirus homarus. French McCay et al [84] reported a coefficient b of 2.934 for an American lobster population, which is similar to our results that gave a coefficient b below 3 for both sexes, while Steinback et al [85] reported a coefficient b of 3.347 for males and 2.972 for females for American lobster. Baggio [37] reported isometric growth of H. americanus (CL vs. W).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Morphometric relationships and allometry were studied in many crustacean species, including crabs [80,81], spiny lobsters [34,82,83], American lobster [37,84,85], and European lobster [27,33,38]. In the present study, ordinary least-square regressions showed that W increased following a power function with both CL and TL, while TL and AW increased linearly with CL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Nonetheless, the size range (4.72-11.98 cm CL) found in this study coincides with that reported in P. polyphagus at the Arabian Sea (Gujarat, India; size interval of 3.5-11.0 cm CL) (Kizhakudan and Patel, 2010). The positive growth allometry in males and negative growth allometry in females of P. polyphagus based on the deviation of regression coefficient b from 3 are expected and commonly observed in crustaceans of good population health (Fazhan et al, 2021a), including other lobster species (Hossain et al, 1987;Steinback et al, 2008). In crustaceans, males would channel most of their energy into the somatic growth to increase their chances in territorial defense and mating, whereas females would focus more on maximizing reproductive outputs ( Elner and Campbell, 2009;Waiho et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%