2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.26.453807
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The benefits of merging passive and active tracking approaches: new insights into riverine migration by salmonid smolts

Abstract: The process of smolting is a critical phase in the life-cycle of anadromous salmonids and it has been associated with substantial rates of mortality. Survival during freshwater and marine migration is known to have population level effects, thus an understanding of the patterns of mortality has the potential to yield important insights into population bottlenecks. Despite important advancements in tracking techniques, the specifics of mortality events in anadromous salmonids during their initial migration to s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 106 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the detection efficiency of acoustic telemetry is not always 100%, and therefore it must be assessed when providing estimates of survival (Halfyard et al ., 2013 ). Receiver efficiency in the freshwater zone was assessed for the final River Endrick receiver (Figure 1 , R17) as well as for the receivers deployed in the River Leven (Figure 1 , R18–R19) and Gryffe (Figure 1 , R1–R2; excluding the final freshwater receivers) by calculating the proportion of smolts detected at a downstream receiver that were not detected at the prior upstream receiver (Chavarie et al ., 2021 ). Lastly, receiver efficiency in the estuarine zone was calculated using a mark‐recapture model as discussed next (Halfyard et al ., 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the detection efficiency of acoustic telemetry is not always 100%, and therefore it must be assessed when providing estimates of survival (Halfyard et al ., 2013 ). Receiver efficiency in the freshwater zone was assessed for the final River Endrick receiver (Figure 1 , R17) as well as for the receivers deployed in the River Leven (Figure 1 , R18–R19) and Gryffe (Figure 1 , R1–R2; excluding the final freshwater receivers) by calculating the proportion of smolts detected at a downstream receiver that were not detected at the prior upstream receiver (Chavarie et al ., 2021 ). Lastly, receiver efficiency in the estuarine zone was calculated using a mark‐recapture model as discussed next (Halfyard et al ., 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%