The benefits of an enhanced Nobody's Perfect Parenting Program for child welfare clients including non-custodial parents

Kennett, Deborah J.; Chislett, Gail

doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.001

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The frequencies of scores varied, with three studies (Haight et al . ; Kennett & Chislett ; Nesmith ) scoring comparatively well, obtaining scores above 3 out of 7. It is important to emphasize the scores relate to the research methodology for the interventions and may not reflect the value of the practice.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Kennett & Chislett () evaluated the Nobody ' s Perfect parenting programme with non‐custodial parents, covering issues such as child behaviour, nutrition and anger management, using group discussion and activities to practice skills and encourage self‐reflection. It does not focus on contact visits but aims to give parents a safe place to think about their lives, their children and role as parents.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 2 shows the scores assigned to the 12 studies were generally low, ranging from 1 to 5 with a median score of 2 out of a possible 7. The frequencies of scores varied, with three studies (Haight et al 2005;Kennett & Chislett 2012;Nesmith 2013) scoring comparatively well, obtaining scores above 3 out of 7. It is important to emphasize the scores relate to the research methodology for the interventions and may not reflect the value of the practice.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interventions to improve supervised contact visits between children in out of home care and their parents: a systematic review

Bullen

Taplin

McArthur

et al. 2016

Child & Family Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the importance of contact between children in care and their parents, when safe, is accepted, there is limited research about supervised face‐to‐face contact. There is no literature that has systematically critiqued how supervised contact can be best delivered. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for interventions aimed at improving the quality of contact visits between parents and their children who are in out‐of‐home care. Twelve studies were included in this review. Each study was graded and assigned scores according to the presence or absence of each of seven criteria. The studies demonstrated key similarities in the types of interventions provided, although delivery varied across group, individual and educational interventions. Parents reported improved capacity to manage their emotions and parents' satisfaction with the programmes was high. Although there was a lack of large scale, methodologically rigorous studies with long‐term follow‐up, some promising findings were identified: the literature indicates individual family support and group programmes have the potential to improve parent–child relationships and the quality of contact visits. This review suggests that future studies build on current evidence by addressing their methodological limitations and evaluating interventions that can be tailored to meet the needs of individual families.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interventions to improve supervised contact visits between children in out of home care and their parents: a systematic review

Bullen

Taplin

McArthur

et al. 2016

Child & Family Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bien que les PEHP soient reconnus comme efficaces, ils ne réussissent pas toujours à retenir les familles vulnérables qui pourraient en bénéficier (Gainey, Catalano, Haggerty et Hoppe, 1995;Kennett et Chislett, 2012;McWey, Holtrop, Wojciak et Claridge, 2014). Pour expliquer cette inadéquation, Kazdin et coll.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…Malgré des résultats encourageants, les études portant sur l'engagement des parents dans des PEHP rapportent des taux d'abandon variant entre 24 % et 72 % (Baker et coll., 2011;Fernandez et Eyberg, 2009;Kennett et Chislett, 2012;Pilette, Letarte, Normandeau et Robaey, 2010). Les parents dépendants à l'alcool ou aux drogues présentent des taux d'abandon particulièrement élevés (Laventure, Charbonneau, Sarrazin et Bertrand, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Parents dépendants à l’alcool et aux drogues

Laventure¹,

Bertrand²,

Boisvert³

et al. 2017

cswr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All Rights Reserved © MyriamLaventure, KarineBertrand, KrystelBoisvert and PatriciaAuger, 2016 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Résumé de l'article Si plusieurs programmes d'entrainement aux habiletés parentales (PEHP) sont reconnus comme efficaces, ils ne réussissent pas toujours à retenir les familles qui pourraient le plus en bénéficier. La présente étude a pour objectif général de mieux comprendre les enjeux entourant l'engagement dans un PEHP des familles dont les parents sont aux prises avec une dépendance. Provenant de quatre centres de réadaptation en dépendance du Québec, l'échantillon est composé de 47 familles ayant initialement accepté de participer à un PEHP. Parmi ces familles, 18 n'ont pas terminé le programme. Les résultats indiquent que comparés aux parents qui ont complété le programme, ceux qui l'ont abandonné présentent une moins bonne situation professionnelle, ils sont plus nombreux à présenter une supervision parentale lacunaire, un manque de communication entre les membres de la famille et un dysfonctionnement familial. De plus, les familles qui ont abandonné le programme ont vécu plus de stress au cours de la dernière année. Ces résultats suggèrent des pistes pour favoriser l'engagement des familles à plus haut risque d'abandonner les PEHP précocement, tel un soutien ciblé lors d'évènements stressants. Canadian Social

show abstract

Children’s Centres: An English Intervention for Families Living in Disadvantaged Communities

Evangelou

Goff

Sylva

et al. 2017

Handbook on Positive Development of Minority Children and Youth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The benefits of an enhanced Nobody's Perfect Parenting Program for child welfare clients including non-custodial parents

Cited by 10 publications

References 22 publications

Interventions to improve supervised contact visits between children in out of home care and their parents: a systematic review

Interventions to improve supervised contact visits between children in out of home care and their parents: a systematic review

Parents dépendants à l’alcool et aux drogues

Children’s Centres: An English Intervention for Families Living in Disadvantaged Communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About