2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The benefit of delayed reassessment post high-volume CSF removal in the diagnosis of shunt-responsive idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cox Proportional-Hazards Model was conducted for mortality analysis. The variable selection of statistical models was based on clinical significance and previously established predictors (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Due to drop-out/missing data, additional steps to detect signs of attrition bias were taken: when all variables (including outcome indicators) were analyzed at the same time to detect systematic tendencies in missing data, no significant tendencies were observed (Little's Missing Completely at Random-test; p = 0.067).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Cox Proportional-Hazards Model was conducted for mortality analysis. The variable selection of statistical models was based on clinical significance and previously established predictors (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Due to drop-out/missing data, additional steps to detect signs of attrition bias were taken: when all variables (including outcome indicators) were analyzed at the same time to detect systematic tendencies in missing data, no significant tendencies were observed (Little's Missing Completely at Random-test; p = 0.067).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies have evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) prior to and after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. A significant heterogeneity exists among the published studies: six different HRQoL instruments were applied, follow-up times ranged from 3 to 45 months and there was a lack of studies replicating and confirming previous findings (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Factors associated with poorer HRQoL outcome in iNPH in uni-or multivariate analyses have been identified: depressive symptoms [2], larger comorbidity burden [2,4,6], obesity [4], hyperlipidemia [2], severity of gait impairment [2], post-operative complications [5] and beta amyloid (Aβ) or hyperphosphorylated tau (HPτ) pathology in the frontal cortical biopsy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, a clinical improvement in gait speed with a small effect was found in most (37.3%), a moderate effect was found in some (7.8%), and no large effect was found in individuals with iNPH who responded to the intervention. These different response levels in the tap test responders may be related to the duration of the assessment 53 and may be important in predicting shunt surgery success in the future. However, because of these MCIC criteria, the number of individuals who responded to the intervention was less than half (45.1%), unlike the results reported in a previous study where people who had a positive response ranged from 67‒86 % of participants 19 , 46 , 54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%