1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf00626239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behaviour of some amino acids in gamma irradiated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus it is clear that loss of viability does not necessarily imply susceptibility to autolysis or attack by soil enzymes. Voets and Dedeken (19) have reported that proteolytic activity remained in gamma-sterilized soils whereas degradation of amino acids did not occur under the same conditions (20). In the present experiments it is possible that Can.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Thus it is clear that loss of viability does not necessarily imply susceptibility to autolysis or attack by soil enzymes. Voets and Dedeken (19) have reported that proteolytic activity remained in gamma-sterilized soils whereas degradation of amino acids did not occur under the same conditions (20). In the present experiments it is possible that Can.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…For example, it is known that soil phosphatase, saccharase, and urease are much more resistant to radiation, being unaffected by 2 Mrad. Voets, Dedeken & Bessems (1965) and Skujins, Braal & McLaren (1962) found that 19 Mrad was required to reduce the initial activity of phosphatase to 37%. Bacq & Alexander (1961) point out that inactivation of enzymes in dilute aqueous solution can show considerable variation.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 98%