Flatfishes 2005
DOI: 10.1002/9780470995259.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behaviour of Flatfishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This behaviour in sand would move the sand to bury the fish (Table 1). This behaviour was termed the "burying" behaviour and has been described for common sole (Kruuk, 1963) and flatfish in general (Gibson, 2005). The "burying" behaviour was observed in three different situations.…”
Section: Ethogrammentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This behaviour in sand would move the sand to bury the fish (Table 1). This behaviour was termed the "burying" behaviour and has been described for common sole (Kruuk, 1963) and flatfish in general (Gibson, 2005). The "burying" behaviour was observed in three different situations.…”
Section: Ethogrammentioning
confidence: 95%
“…during the ice-covered period) and habitat overlap (Allen & Smith 1988). Flatfish often use an ambush foraging strategy to capture prey (Gibson 2005); for example, Kawabe et al (2004) observed rapid ambush movements of ~40 s into the pelagic water column by Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus to catch prey. Greenland halibut may undertake a similar strategy; however, the shortest sampling period interval used in this study (150 s) would likely not be able to identify such rapid foraging movements.…”
Section: Depth Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amara (2003) indicates that despite the concentration and high abundance of juvenile sole and plaice during summer, their growth is determined by the prevailing water temperature and not by food availability. Moreover, in the case of the soles, being visual feeders, the interaction of decreasing food availability and day length during winter can reduce access to the food resource (Gibson 2005). In the case of the plaice, the winter growth arrest is not only related to low winter water (P > 0.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amara (2003) indica que a pesar de la concentración y la elevada abundancia de jóvenes de lenguado y platija durante el verano, su crecimiento está determinado principalmente por la temperatura del agua y no por la disponibilidad de alimento. En el caso del lenguado, que es un depredador visual, la interacción de la disminución de la disponibilidad de alimento y de la duración de las horas de luz solar durante el invierno puede reducir el acceso a los recursos alimenticios (Gibson 2005). En el caso de la platija, la disminución del crecimiento durante el invierno no está relacionada única-mente con las bajas temperaturas del agua, sino también con factores medioambientales desfavorables, como la disminución de la abundancia de presas y la reducción de las horas de luz solar, que afectan al éxito alimenticio (Amara 2003, Link et al 2005, Rijnsdorp y Witthames 2005, Vinagre et al 2006, Félix et al 2011.…”
Section: Figura 4 Curva De Crecimiento Estacional De Von Bertalanffyunclassified