1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00043005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behaviour of Atlantic salmon in relation to efficient cage-rearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some fish species in nature school together while other fish species are more territorial, and in some cases escapes from sea cages might be a part of a mechanism to disperse from other individuals in the population. For example, groups of Atlantic salmon normally swim in a circular pattern along the perimeter of the cage wall (Fernö et al 1995, Juell 1995, while Atlantic cod is described as an exploratory feeder (van Duren & Glass 1992, Hart 1993, Løkke-borg 1998, which uses a wide range of feeding strategies and thus a less regular movement pattern than salmon, increasing the chance of finding a hole in the net. For example, cod in sea cages spend much of the time close to the net wall, not coordinated with conspecifics and with a continuously changing speed and direction (Rillahan et al 2011), corresponding with the movement pattern observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some fish species in nature school together while other fish species are more territorial, and in some cases escapes from sea cages might be a part of a mechanism to disperse from other individuals in the population. For example, groups of Atlantic salmon normally swim in a circular pattern along the perimeter of the cage wall (Fernö et al 1995, Juell 1995, while Atlantic cod is described as an exploratory feeder (van Duren & Glass 1992, Hart 1993, Løkke-borg 1998, which uses a wide range of feeding strategies and thus a less regular movement pattern than salmon, increasing the chance of finding a hole in the net. For example, cod in sea cages spend much of the time close to the net wall, not coordinated with conspecifics and with a continuously changing speed and direction (Rillahan et al 2011), corresponding with the movement pattern observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fish tanks and cages, there will usually be areas that are more favourable than the others and restricting these volumes will result in a trade-off between packing density (number of fish per cubic metre, Juell and Fosseidengen 2004) and environmental conditions. Especially in sea cages, there can be large environmental gradients, with highly variable temperature, salinity, oxygen, current speed and light conditions (Juell 1995, Juell and Fosseidengen 2004, Johansson et al 2006. Fish are attracted to the most optimal areas and avoid the unfavourable ones as a result of both attractions to a part of the rearing volume with preferred environmental conditions and avoidance/repulsion from areas with poor environmental conditions.…”
Section: Group Swimming Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish are attracted to the most optimal areas and avoid the unfavourable ones as a result of both attractions to a part of the rearing volume with preferred environmental conditions and avoidance/repulsion from areas with poor environmental conditions. Such conditions cause a trade-off between packing density and the benefits of being in the relatively best areas, and at high stocking densities, the less competitive fish will be forced to stay in suboptimal areas (Juell 1995, Johansson et al 2006). The behaviour of the fish can also have an effect on environmental conditions, and the high local concentrations of fish can cause reduced water flow and increased oxygen consumption leading to areas with hypoxia.…”
Section: Group Swimming Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of production efficiency, it is well documented that moderate exercise provide Swimming in a circular structure might reduce stress and improve growth efficiency due 291 to less confrontations within the sea cage (Juell, 1995), while increased appetite has been 292 observed to coincide with a change from unstructured to circular schooling (Fernö et al,293 1988). Concerning acceptable fish welfare and optimal growth rates, it may be argued that considered in welfare assessments at exposed locations, since they may impair swimming 324 capabilities (Brett, 1964;Jones, 1971).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%