1956
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/43.1-2.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behaviour of an Estimator for a Simple Birth and Death Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speciation events give birth to new species, and extinction events result in the death of species. This representation is practical for modelling the diversification of lineages since, with some further assumptions, this agrees with the birth-and-death processes which have been extensively studied in the past (Kendall 1948a(Kendall , b, 1949Darwin, 1956;Keiding, 1975). Nee et al (1994b) proposed a method to estimate both speciation and extinction rates of a lineage using the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the living species, for instance using molecular data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Speciation events give birth to new species, and extinction events result in the death of species. This representation is practical for modelling the diversification of lineages since, with some further assumptions, this agrees with the birth-and-death processes which have been extensively studied in the past (Kendall 1948a(Kendall , b, 1949Darwin, 1956;Keiding, 1975). Nee et al (1994b) proposed a method to estimate both speciation and extinction rates of a lineage using the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the living species, for instance using molecular data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…More realistically, if there is an intrinsic death rate (or, for species and higher taxa, extinction rate) μ , then one has a time-homogeneous birth and death process defined by the differential equation, e.g., Kendall (1948), Darwin (1954), and Keiding (1975), rightdpndtleft=λ(n1)pn1(λ+μ)npn+μ(n+1)pn+1thickmathspaceforthickmathspacen>0,rightdp0dtleft=μp1. The solutions for λ ≠ μ given p 1 (0)=1 are given by rightpn(t)left=(λμ)2exp[(λμ)t](λμexp[(λμ)t])2true(λλexp[(λμ)t]λμexp[(λμ)t]true)n1thickmathspaceforthickmathspacen>0,rightp0(t)left=μμexp[(λμ)t]λμexp[(λμ)t]. In the special case where λ = μ , the solutions simplify to: rightpn(t)left=(λt)n1(λt+1)n+1thickmathspaceforthickmathspacen>0,rightp0(t)left=λtλt+1....…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum likelihood estimator can be constructed using the probability distribution as given by Darwin (1956). Although the likelihood function takes an explicit form, we found that the calculation of the maximum likelihood estimator became numerically challenging as the size of the process got large, thereby warranting alternative approaches to be investigated.…”
Section: Examples and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kendall (1949), Darwin (1956), and Keiding (1974, 1975) investigated maximum likelihood estimation for the pure birth and the linear birth-and-death processes. Oh, Severo and Slivka (1991) proposed approximate maximum likelihood estimators for a class of pure birth processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%