The Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01) in community-based adults with intellectual disabilities: Reliability and concurrent validity vis-à-vis the Inventory for Client and Agency Planning (ICAP)☆

Psychometric Evaluation of Romanian Translations of theBehavior Problems Inventory-01and theNisonger Child Behavior Rating Form

“…Internal consistency of the Romanian BPI-01 was found to be good and even somewhat better than some studies on the English version have shown so far (González et al, 2009;Gray et al, 2009;Rojahn et al, 2001;van Ingen, Moore, Zaja, & Rojahn, 2010). For the NCBRF Social Competence subscales and for the six NCBRF Problem Behavior subscales internal consistency ranged between fair to excellent and generally fell in the ballpark found by other researchers working on the English version Gray et al, 2009;Lecavalier et al, 2006;Tassé & Lecavalier, 2000) and a French version (Girouard et al, 1998;Tassé & Lecavalier, 2000).…”

The Behavior Problems Inventory‐Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Part II: reliability and validity

“…2001, 2010a; González et al . 2009; van Ingen et al . 2010) but remain to be examined in future research for the BPI‐S.…”

Risk factors associated with challenging behaviour in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities

“…The psychometric properties of the original BPI are good (Rojahn et al ; González et al ; Van Ingen et al ). These findings are in line with studies by Dumont et al () and Lambrechts & Maes () into the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the BPI‐01 for people with a profound ID.…”