2001
DOI: 10.1353/cwh.2001.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Beards Were Right: Parties in the North, 1840–1860

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Great Lakes region “carried the commerce for a booming regional economy that involved at least seven states. The Great Lakes, in short, were the heart of a powerful, dynamic, far‐reaching regional economy” (Egnal, 2001, p. 46). Although a part of the region, New York's instability worried WOC and pointed him from California to new venture opportunities in Michigan, Illinois and elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Great Lakes region “carried the commerce for a booming regional economy that involved at least seven states. The Great Lakes, in short, were the heart of a powerful, dynamic, far‐reaching regional economy” (Egnal, 2001, p. 46). Although a part of the region, New York's instability worried WOC and pointed him from California to new venture opportunities in Michigan, Illinois and elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnocultural and economic theories of voting behavior provide conflicting explanations for why Americans voted the way they did in the nineteenth century, the former suggesting that ethnic and religious issues and divisions drove electoral behavior, the latter arguing that elections were principally contested over economic issues and divisions. Recent studies using aggregate data from Congressional districts, such as the percentage of the population employed in agriculture or manufacturing, argue that marginalized economic groups opposed the Republican Party's support for the gold standard, tariffs, and industrial modernization (Bensel 2000; Egnal 2001; Gilligan, Marshal, and Weingast 1989; Jenkins, Schickler, and Carson 2004; Lynch 2002b; Ritter 1997; Sanders 1999). Others use insights from contemporary research (Erikson 1990; Fiorina 1981; Kinder and Kiewiet 1979; Kramer 1971) to argue that nineteenth‐century voters punished incumbents during periods of economic decline or instability (Holt 1992; Lin 1999; Lynch 1999).…”
Section: Theories Of Nineteenth‐century Voting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%