2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.08.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The beam energy measurement system for the Beijing electron–positron collider

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two days were used to perform the ψ scan. The mass difference between the PDG (2010) value and the measured result by BEMS is 1 ± 36 keV, the deviation of which indicates that the relative accuracy of BEMS is at the level of 2 × 10 −5 [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two days were used to perform the ψ scan. The mass difference between the PDG (2010) value and the measured result by BEMS is 1 ± 36 keV, the deviation of which indicates that the relative accuracy of BEMS is at the level of 2 × 10 −5 [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Starting from the year 2007, a high accuracy beam energy measurement system (BEMS) located at the north crossing point (NCP) of BEPCII was designed, constructed and put into the commissioning at the end of 2010 [8][9][10][11]. The layout schematic of the system is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has been commissioned and routinely measures the beam energy with a precision of δ E beam /E beam ≃ 10 −5 [45].…”
Section: Qcd Two-photon τ and Xy Z-meson Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we are not going to discuss here various * N.Yu.Muchnoi@inp.nsk.su technical aspects like an accuracy of the HPGe detector energy scale calibration, its response function shape, etc. The references about these issues may be found in [2] and citations therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%