2015
DOI: 10.1515/9781400866496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Battle for Yellowstone: Morality and the Sacred Roots of Environmental Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mounting body of literature on environmental conflict has examined the potential linkage between environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and conflict (Buchanan 2013;Farrell 2017), but arguably a significant restriction of this theory has been its inability to identify the existence of opportunities for cooperation between the actors in a coupled human-environment system (Conca and Dabelko 2002). An emergent alternative theory is that environmental degradation has the potential to lead environmental cooperation resulting in lasting peace (Conca and Wallace 2009;Ide 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Environmental Peace-buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mounting body of literature on environmental conflict has examined the potential linkage between environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and conflict (Buchanan 2013;Farrell 2017), but arguably a significant restriction of this theory has been its inability to identify the existence of opportunities for cooperation between the actors in a coupled human-environment system (Conca and Dabelko 2002). An emergent alternative theory is that environmental degradation has the potential to lead environmental cooperation resulting in lasting peace (Conca and Wallace 2009;Ide 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Environmental Peace-buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Bean's research, we expect to find subcultural boundaries that exclude government and perceived leftist political agendas among AESGs but not CESGs. Political differences will also influence more negative views on environmentalism among AESGs, which is viewed as part of a "liberal" agenda or as an alternative sacred (Farrell 2015). Schwadel and Johnson (2017;see also Danielson 2013;Kilburn 2014;Sherkat and Ellison 2007) have demonstrated that U.S. evangelical's lack of environmental concern is related to their biblical literalism and Republican Party affiliation, even though some (younger) evangelicals may be changing, as the "greening of Christianity" thesis suggests (Clements, Xiao, and McCright 2014;Smith and Johnson 2010).…”
Section: Theorizing National Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the surface, Bell’s account of the natural conscience runs parallel to the moral impulse of many environmental movements for preservation (e.g., Farrell 2015) or conservation (Taylor 2016) in that nature’s perceived moral purity is juxtaposed against the corruption of city life (also see Bell 2018). The similarities, however, largely end there.…”
Section: ‘Redneck’ Identity the Natural Conscience And Anti‐state Pmentioning
confidence: 99%