2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03854-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor SHARP1 is an oncogenic driver in MLL-AF6 acute myelogenous leukemia

Abstract: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with MLL gene rearrangements demonstrate unique gene expression profiles driven by MLL-fusion proteins. Here, we identify the circadian clock transcription factor SHARP1 as a novel oncogenic target in MLL-AF6 AML, which has the worst prognosis among all subtypes of MLL-rearranged AMLs. SHARP1 is expressed solely in MLL-AF6 AML, and its expression is regulated directly by MLL-AF6/DOT1L. Suppression of SHARP1 induces robust apoptosis of human MLL-AF6 AML cells. Genetic deletion in mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1E) MBNL1 was recently demonstrated to be a direct target of the MLL-AF4 fusion protein in patientderived ALL cell lines as well as in an experimental retroviral model 20,29 . To determine whether this observation applied to leukemia cells bearing different MLL-fusion partners, we analyzed MLL-fusion protein (MLL-N and fusion partner C-terminus if applicable) and H3K79me2 chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) datasets from THP-1 30 and ML-2 31 cell lines (with MLL-AF9 and MLL-AF6 respectively), as well as from the MV4;11 30 , RS4;11 32 , and SEM 33 cell lines which bear an MLL-AF4 fusion. We found evidence of MLL-N/fusion-C binding to the MBNL1 promoter and gene body, along with H3K79me2 enrichment across all cell lines studied (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1E) MBNL1 was recently demonstrated to be a direct target of the MLL-AF4 fusion protein in patientderived ALL cell lines as well as in an experimental retroviral model 20,29 . To determine whether this observation applied to leukemia cells bearing different MLL-fusion partners, we analyzed MLL-fusion protein (MLL-N and fusion partner C-terminus if applicable) and H3K79me2 chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) datasets from THP-1 30 and ML-2 31 cell lines (with MLL-AF9 and MLL-AF6 respectively), as well as from the MV4;11 30 , RS4;11 32 , and SEM 33 cell lines which bear an MLL-AF4 fusion. We found evidence of MLL-N/fusion-C binding to the MBNL1 promoter and gene body, along with H3K79me2 enrichment across all cell lines studied (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was previously reported that Bhlhe40 and Bhlhe41 function predominantly as transcriptional repressors in many (Ow et al, 2014) but possibly not all (Numata et al, 2018) cellular contexts. In line with the repressive function of these transcription factors in AMs, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) demonstrated that genes associated with Bhlhe40 peaks were enriched among genes upregulated in DKO AMs (Figs 5E and EV4B).…”
Section: Broad Footprint Of Bhlhe40/bhlhe41 Deficiency On the Am Tranmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is possible that some other chromatin-bound factors mediate the interaction between MLL and AF4 through the TRX2 domain. It has been reported that the region containing the TRX2 domain also associates with SHARP1, which may be involved in interaction between MLL and AF4 (Numata et al, 2018). Although the MLL 5′ portion retains the TRX2 domain, it cannot activate transcription of Hoxa9 and transform myeloid progenitors without its fusion partner portion (Lavau et al, 1997; Slany et al, 1998; Okuda et al, 2017), indicating that AF4 bound with the TRX2 domain is transcriptionally inactive and needs to form an AEP complex with ENL on nearby chromatin to become functional (Figure 5C).…”
Section: The Role Of Trx2 Domain Of Mllmentioning
confidence: 99%