Epple (PhD), born in 1968, is a social anthropologist and research affiliate at the Frobenius Institute in Frankfurt/Main. She has undertaken extensive fieldwork in Southern Ethiopia for 25 years, and has taught and published extensively on issues related to gender and age in agropastoral societies, cultural contact and change, hereditary status groups, and legal pluralism. Getachew Assefa (PhD), born in 1973, is associate professor of law at Addis Ababa University. He has published widely on issues related to minority rights, federalism and constitutional litigation, and legal pluralism. His areas of interest include comparative constitutional law and federalism, human rights, traditional governance and justice systems, as well as law and religion.
2The Convention is very clear about its aims to eradicate all practices discriminating against women, even if that means changing cultural values, and even if women belonging to a specific culture do not perceive them as harmful (see www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw). 3Anthropologists were long aware of but only marginally involved in the debate on how 'global law can be translated into the vernacular' (Merry 2006:2). It was only after the end of the Cold War in the late 1980s that anthropology engaged actively in research and debates around International Human Rights (Goodale 2009:2). The 'Declaration on Anthropology and Human Rights' , voted on and approved by the general membership of the American Anthropologists Association (AAA) in 1999, clearly expressed the 'commitment to human rights consistent with international principles' and declared it mandatory for anthropologists 'to be involved in the debate on enlarging our understanding of human rights on the basis of anthropological knowledge and research' (Goodale 2009:7). 4Conversely, in anthropology it has long been agreed that culture is something fluid, contested, dynamic, and fundamentally hybrid.
The dilemma of government officialsWithin any given legally plural social field, diverse actors operate and pursue their individual interests. Many studies on legal pluralism have investigated the decision-making processes of justice-seeking members of local communities, and have explored how the specific background, gender, age, or profession of individuals influences their decisions about which legal forum to choose or 'shop from' (K. von Benda-Beckmann 1981). 6 However, the perspective of state actors, the 'paradox' (Zenker and Hoehne 2018) of their having to deal with custom in order to get their work for the state done, their background and personal interests, their actions and choices, and the contexts in which they work have only become of interest in