2006
DOI: 10.1139/e06-046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The basal unconformity of the Nanaimo Group, southwestern British Columbia: a Late Cretaceous storm-swept rocky shoreline

Abstract: The Turonian to Santonian Comox Formation forms the basal unit of the Nanaimo Group. In the southern Gulf Islands of British Columbia, the Comox Formation nonconformably overlies Devonian metavolcanic and Jurassic intrusive rocks and is interpreted to reflect a rocky foreshore reworked by waves and ultimately drowned during transgression. The nonconformity displays a relief of metres to tens of metres. Basal deposits vary in thickness, as does the facies character along the several kilometres of paleoshoreline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that chert in the lower Nanaimo Group derived from minor chert units within strata of Wrangellia (Pacht, 1984;Brandon et al, 1986), which is thought to have formed basement highs that controlled sedimentation of the lower Nanaimo Group (Pacht, 1984;Mustard, 1994;Kent et al, 2019), as well as acted as a sediment source (Huang et al, 2019). The lack of chert in the upper Nanaimo Group in these regions could signal burial of Wrangellian basement during progressive onlap of the basal unconformity during deposition of lower Nanaimo Group (Johnstone et al, 2006;Kent et al, 2019 1-13) and potential source terranes in the NCTS (i.e., PDFs 14-24). Note scale break at 300 Ma.…”
Section: Influence Of the North Cascade Thrust System On The Nanaimo mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that chert in the lower Nanaimo Group derived from minor chert units within strata of Wrangellia (Pacht, 1984;Brandon et al, 1986), which is thought to have formed basement highs that controlled sedimentation of the lower Nanaimo Group (Pacht, 1984;Mustard, 1994;Kent et al, 2019), as well as acted as a sediment source (Huang et al, 2019). The lack of chert in the upper Nanaimo Group in these regions could signal burial of Wrangellian basement during progressive onlap of the basal unconformity during deposition of lower Nanaimo Group (Johnstone et al, 2006;Kent et al, 2019 1-13) and potential source terranes in the NCTS (i.e., PDFs 14-24). Note scale break at 300 Ma.…”
Section: Influence Of the North Cascade Thrust System On The Nanaimo mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation is interpreted to consist, in some areas, of fluvial sediments that were trapped by topographic highs during deposition, whereas in other areas consists of deltaic deposits (Johnstone et al, 2006).…”
Section: Pictures C and D) The Comoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the Comox Formation was thought to be Santonian in age (Muller and Jeletzky 1970;Bickford and Kenyon 1988;Kenyon et al 1992), but deposits in the Gulf and San Juan Islands have been dated to the Turonian (Haggart 1994;Haggart et al 2005). Although Haggart (1994) and Haggart et al (2005) argue that Turonian sediments in the Gulf and San Juan Islands ought to be considered Sidney Island Formation, Johnstone et al (2006) recognize similar lithology and sedimentology between these and the Vancouver Island sites. As such, the Comox Formation is understood to be diachronous in nature, encompassing the Turonian to early Campanian (Mustard 1994;Johnstone et al 2006;Karafit 2008;Karafit and Stockey 2008).…”
Section: Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although Haggart (1994) and Haggart et al (2005) argue that Turonian sediments in the Gulf and San Juan Islands ought to be considered Sidney Island Formation, Johnstone et al (2006) recognize similar lithology and sedimentology between these and the Vancouver Island sites. As such, the Comox Formation is understood to be diachronous in nature, encompassing the Turonian to early Campanian (Mustard 1994;Johnstone et al 2006;Karafit 2008;Karafit and Stockey 2008). The Comox Formation beds from which this specimen was obtained are exposed along the Eden Main logging road (Schweitzer et al 2003;Karafit 2008), which is 35 km northwest of the city of Comox (lat.…”
Section: Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 92%