The barriers to realising sustainable process improvement: A root cause analysis of paradigms for manufacturing systems improvement

Abstract

To become world-class, manufacturing organisations employ an array of tools and methods to realise process improvement. However, many of these fail to meet expectations and/or bring about new less well understood problems. Hence, prior to developing further tools and methods it is first necessary to understand the reasons why such initiatives fail. This paper seeks to elicit the root causes of failed implementations and consider how these may be overcome. The paper begins by reviewing various paradigms for manufacturing systems improvement including design/redesign-, maintenance-, operator-, process-, product-and quality-led initiatives. In addition to examining the knowledge requirements of these approaches, the barriers to realising improvement are examined through consideration and review of literature from the fields of manufacturing, management and information systems. These fields are selected because of the considerable work that deals with process improvement, change management, information systems implementation and production systems. The review reveals the importance of fundamental understanding and highlights the lack of current methods for generating such understanding. To address this issue, the concept of machine-material interaction is introduced and a set of requirements for a supportive methodology to generate the fundamental understanding necessary to realise sustainable process improvement is developed.

Sustainable production in the UK: a tool to support printed circuit assembly (PCA) manufacturing

“…1 Even though sustainability is a young discipline, there has been much work in the area of sustainable production, which has generated a variety of tools and paradigms (e.g. Bufardi et al 2003, Wanyama et al 2003, Darlington and Rahimifard 2006, Hicks and Matthews 2010. One of the most comprehensive approaches for assessing and improving a product's environmental performance is Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Huijbregts et al 2010).…”

Developing organisational learning through QC story

“…The application of QC story should result in problem-solving and process improvement, however, many process improvements fail to meet expectations (Hicks & Matthews, 2010). Furthermore, after obtaining positive results, a new challenge arises to keep the achieved level of performance over time (Wu & Chen, 2004), because most improvement programmes end in failure (Keating, Oliva, Repenning, Rockart, & Sterman, 1999).…”

From successful to sustainable Lean production – the case of a Lean Prize Award Winner

“…Keating, Oliva, Repenning, Rockart, and Sterman (1999) referred to this as the improvement paradox, wherein companies find it difficult to sustain even initially successful improvement programmes. Even more puzzling, improvement programmes sometimes worsen business performance, trigger layoffs, lower morale and collapse employee commitment (Dervitsiotis, 2001;Hicks & Matthews, 2010;Keating et al, 1999).…”