The barriers and facilitators to the implementation of National Clinical Programmes in Ireland: using the MRC framework for process evaluations

Abstract

BackgroundA major healthcare reform agenda in Ireland is underway which underpins the establishment of a series of National Clinical Programmes (NCPs), which aim to take an evidence based approach to improve quality, access and value. The current study aimed to determine the enablers and barriers to implementation of the NCPs.MethodsA qualitative methodology advocated by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework on conducting process evaluations of complex interventions guided this research. Purposive sampling techniques were used to recruit participants from seven NCPs across both acute and chronic healthcare domains, comprised of orthopaedics, rheumatology, elective surgery, emergency medicine, paediatrics, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A total of 33 participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included current and previous Clinical Leads, Programme Managers, Health Service Executive management, hospital Chief Executive Officers, representatives of General Practice, and a Nursing and a Patient representative. Thematic analyses was conducted.ResultsA range of factors of different combinations and co-occurrence were highlighted across a total of six themes, including (i) positive leadership, governance and clinical networks of the NCPs, (ii) the political and social context in which the NCPs operate, (iii) constraints on resources, (iv) a passive attitudinal resistance to change borne from poor consultation and communication, (v) lack of data and information technology, (vi) forces outside of the NCPs such as the general practitioner contract thwarting change of the model of care.ConclusionsThe MRC framework proved a useful tool to conduct this process evaluation. Results from this research provide real world experiences and insight from the people charged with implementing large-scale health system improvement initiatives. The findings highlight the need for measured responses that acknowledge both direct and non-direct challenges and opportunities for successful change. Combined, it is recommended that these elements be considered in the planning and implementation of large-scale initiatives across healthcare delivery systems, both in Ireland and internationally.

A mixed methods multiple case study to evaluate the implementation of a care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery using extended normalization process theory

“…High IRs were achieved in hospitals in which a trained facilitator or quality management officer provided support for the improvement team. A lack of resources is a well-documented barrier to implementation [10][11][12][31][32][33][34]. However, our data suggest both high-and low-performing hospitals experienced a lack of resources.…”

Prevention of health care associated venous thromboembolism through implementing VTE prevention clinical practice guidelines in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…While much work has been undertaken over the past 10 years to support the identification of behavior change interventions, not all areas of study have embraced this, and there is much more work to be done especially where implementing guidelines are concerned. The use of checklists has provided some support, and it is recommended that interventions to improve implementation of guidelines is better reported so that the aspects of the multimodal intervention that work are understood [65,66].…”

Conhecimento dos enfermeiros da atenção primária à saúde sobre fatores de risco para Lesão Renal Aguda

“…This, in turn, may be useful in constructing evidence bases to substantiate the practice. 14 Certainly, the orientation of self-care measures is linked to health promotion, but also greater well-being by the emphasis on healthy habits, besides allowing the investigation and exposure of the potential risks of non-adherence to treatment and, consequently, the targeting of the guidelines. According to the self-care model, it is possible to enhance the patient's ability to acquire greater independence and autonomy over their treatment, as well as a greater burden of responsibility, aiming at improving the understanding and acceptance of the necessary care for life maintenance and general well-being.…”