2014
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/31/7/075014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Barrett–Crane model: asymptotic measure factor

Abstract: The original spin foam model construction for 4D gravity by Barrett and Crane suffers from a few troubling issues. In the simple examples of the vertex amplitude they can be summarized as the existence of contributions to the asymptotics from non geometric configurations. Even restricted to geometric contributions the amplitude is not completely worked out. While the phase is known to be the Regge action, the so called measure factor has remained mysterious for a decade. In the toy model case of the 6j symbol … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively one can devise measure factors that are local and lead to an approximate invariance near very symmetric configurations. Such measure factors could be taken as a hint for choosing the measure for spin foams, see for instance [39] for a first geometric interpretation of the measure factor for a 4D model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively one can devise measure factors that are local and lead to an approximate invariance near very symmetric configurations. Such measure factors could be taken as a hint for choosing the measure for spin foams, see for instance [39] for a first geometric interpretation of the measure factor for a 4D model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Non-degeneracy of the Hessian: This was checked for specific configurations in the standard EPRL model [12]. It is known that it fails in the Barrett-Crane model for certain non-generic but geometric data [29]. We expect that the Hessian in the EPRL model is always nondegenerate if the reconstructed 4-simplex is non-degenerate.…”
Section: • Boundary Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spin foams, and also the discussed intertwiner models, are complex assigning ∼ exp(iS) to the path integral (for one orientation), also for Riemannian signature. Moreover, it is well-known from spin foam asymptotics [101][102][103][104][105][106] that both orientations of a 4-simplex have to be considered, such that one rather finds ∼ cos(S Regge ), where S Regge is the Regge action [107] associated to the 4-simplex. To the author's best knowledge, it is not known whether it is consistent to couple a Wick-rotated matter theory to a non-rotated gravitational theory and, moreover, in which way matter should couple to different orientations.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%