2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bark, the howl and the bark-howl: Identity cues in dingoes’ multicomponent calls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…howl segments). In other words, these results confirm that vocal identity signatures shared by howl vocalisations and howl segments28 are salient to receivers. Although it may be that howl segments have no/alternative functions, we propose that affixed howl segments may function as ‘identity signals’.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…howl segments). In other words, these results confirm that vocal identity signatures shared by howl vocalisations and howl segments28 are salient to receivers. Although it may be that howl segments have no/alternative functions, we propose that affixed howl segments may function as ‘identity signals’.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, there is evidence to indicate that dogs’ barks can convey information on individual identity and the context of production4344 and dingoes’ bark segments have similarly been found to be individually distinctive (although to a lesser extent than howl segments28). Thus, it could be that the redundant coding of identity cues in bark and howl segments facilitates individual discrimination28. Future research could aim to investigate the relative importance of the bark segment’s structure with regards to its potential information content and efficacy effects using sound resynthesis techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We evaluated the success of the procedures by comparing the success rates obtained to the success rates obtained on 1,000 permutated datasets, where calls were randomized across individuals. This comparative approach allows obtaining expected classification rates, which pertain directly to the dataset investigated, rather than relying on a theoretical distribution (see [50] for more details on the methods). Data were transformed to reach approximate symmetrical distribution when needed and scaled (mean = 0 and s.d.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%