2015
DOI: 10.1111/jace.13961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Band Gap of BaPrO3 Studied by Optical and Electrical Methods

Abstract: We report on measurements of the electrical and optical properties of BaPrO3. The temperature dependences of the electrical conductivity σ and the Seebeck coefficient α of polycrystalline samples were studied over a wide temperature range (300°C–1050°C). At lower temperatures, the observed charge transport can be described as thermally activated hopping of electron‐based small polarons with an activation energy of 0.37 eV. An observed change in temperature dependence of both σ and α around 700°C was observed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated changes in conductivity from redox reactions were applied to the respective Arrhenius plots, and this adjustment resulted in less than 4% change in the calculated activation energies for both samples; this change is within the error of experimental measurements and is considered negligible. Second, intrinsic carrier generation was ruled out because the observed activation energies were significantly lower than half the expected band gaps: for undoped BPO, the gap has been reported to be about 2 eV 74 and undoped PGO is predicted to have a band gap >3 eV by first-principles DFT calculations, 75 in agreement with calculations made in this work. Further, considering the simulations in the present work, since O-2p holes are expected to form in both materials, PGM and BPY would be more appropriately described by using high U values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The calculated changes in conductivity from redox reactions were applied to the respective Arrhenius plots, and this adjustment resulted in less than 4% change in the calculated activation energies for both samples; this change is within the error of experimental measurements and is considered negligible. Second, intrinsic carrier generation was ruled out because the observed activation energies were significantly lower than half the expected band gaps: for undoped BPO, the gap has been reported to be about 2 eV 74 and undoped PGO is predicted to have a band gap >3 eV by first-principles DFT calculations, 75 in agreement with calculations made in this work. Further, considering the simulations in the present work, since O-2p holes are expected to form in both materials, PGM and BPY would be more appropriately described by using high U values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Usually, the optical band gap is higher than the electrical band gap [15], most typically four times higher [16]. Here, in case of LiF 700-2, the optical gap is 3.65 eV, and the electrical gap is 0.277 eV at room temperature.…”
Section: Optical and Electronic Band Gapsmentioning
confidence: 97%