2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ball on three balls test for strength testing of brittle discs: Part II: analysis of possible errors in the strength determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a stress state of threefold rotational symmetry. Since higher tensile stresses occur between the balls, [9][10][11] the location of fracture is predefined. The diameter of both loading and supporting ball is d K ¼ 2.5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to a stress state of threefold rotational symmetry. Since higher tensile stresses occur between the balls, [9][10][11] the location of fracture is predefined. The diameter of both loading and supporting ball is d K ¼ 2.5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, no surface finishing of the specimen is necessary. The applicability of the B3B to brittle materials was introduced by Börger et al [9] to evaluate the strength of a material by mechanical testing. The specimen is loaded displacement controlled with a constant displacement rate of _ u ¼ 0:05 mm min À1 until the specimen fails.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…glasses, ceramics) [27][28][29], and has also been applied to cemented carbides [23,30,31], and even metal alloys [32], due to some advantages compared to the most common standardized tests, such as 3-point and 4-point bending. Specifically, the main advantages include ease preparation of test samples, high tolerance for some out of flatness of the disc and/or misalignment, much lower friction than in the other common tests, possibility of using small test specimens (even with irregular shape and closer to the real workpiece geometry), absence of tensile loaded edges, among others [23,25,27,28,33]. The main disadvantage of the B3B method is that the load is concentrated in a very small location of the sample and, thus, larger critical defects may not be sampled during the tests.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Mechanical Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexural strength was measured under uniaxial stress using the ball on three balls test (B3B-test) [24][25][26][27][28], where a disc specimen is supported on three balls and loaded symmetrically by a fourth ball. In this loading situation, the three-point support guarantees three well-defined point contacts.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the midpoint of the disc surface opposite of the loading ball, a biaxial tensile stress state exists, which is used for the biaxial strength testing. This test has been recognised to be tolerant for imperfect disc flatness, an imperfection in other small geometries or some misalignment [24,25].…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%