Abstract:The article aimed to present the balance of outlays and the effects of restructuring Polish hard coal mining companies in the face of directions of the Energy Policy of Poland PEP 2040. The research problem is defined by the following question: have the goals of restructuring coal mining companies been achieved (and to what extent), and has the restructuring-related expenditure been economically rational? An answer to this question is based on the verification of five research hypotheses, in particular, have t… Show more
“…Radical changes have been introduced to Polish mines since 1990 when the economy was changed to a market economy and mines became capital companies. It can be expected that with Poland's radical energy policy (moving away from coal as an energy source), which is in line with European policy, mines need to be restructured again [77,78]. This time, methane may have to be used as a gas.…”
This study presents the econometric model for the Polish mining industry on the topic of the configuration path of decarbonisation based on coal mine methane (CMM). CMM is released from coal mines around the world, including Poland. CMM is taken into account in the decarbonisation of countries with the highest underground coal production. Over the past ten years, CMM emissions have been gaining greater attention due to their status as We accept greenhouse gas (GHG) and their potential use as a clean energy resource. The very important problem for the mining plants is the system of controlling the level of methane. In this paper, we present an econometric model for mine production linear programming, taking into account both market considerations and controlling the amount of methane released into the air from mines. This model can use to control methane in the Polish mining industry. Moreover, this model can be used in the strategy of decarbonisation of the Polish industry according to the European strategy toward net zero (2050).
“…Radical changes have been introduced to Polish mines since 1990 when the economy was changed to a market economy and mines became capital companies. It can be expected that with Poland's radical energy policy (moving away from coal as an energy source), which is in line with European policy, mines need to be restructured again [77,78]. This time, methane may have to be used as a gas.…”
This study presents the econometric model for the Polish mining industry on the topic of the configuration path of decarbonisation based on coal mine methane (CMM). CMM is released from coal mines around the world, including Poland. CMM is taken into account in the decarbonisation of countries with the highest underground coal production. Over the past ten years, CMM emissions have been gaining greater attention due to their status as We accept greenhouse gas (GHG) and their potential use as a clean energy resource. The very important problem for the mining plants is the system of controlling the level of methane. In this paper, we present an econometric model for mine production linear programming, taking into account both market considerations and controlling the amount of methane released into the air from mines. This model can use to control methane in the Polish mining industry. Moreover, this model can be used in the strategy of decarbonisation of the Polish industry according to the European strategy toward net zero (2050).
“…It is carried out in only two deposits, and the annual volume of extraction is about 5 million cubic meters (data for 2020), which is 1 per mille of national gas extraction and about 1.7% of methane captured during coal mining [54]. It has been assumed that the most important criterion indicating the possibility of extracting methane from a discontinued deposit is the total amount of methane emissions (methane yield) recorded during coal mining [55,56]. In the case of closed mines, the amount of methane decreases from year to year.…”
Section: Additional Information Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to estimates by the Central Mining Institute, during the first year, the amount of methane emissions from a single longwall drops to less than 20% of the average methane yield of that longwall from the period of its operation [54]. After a few years, the amount of methane emitted is only a few percent of the initial volume of emissions, and after a dozen years (estimated to be about 15 years), emissions virtually disappear [54][55][56].…”
This paper presents a thorough examination of methane capture from Polish coal mines, contextualized within the framework of the European Union’s (EU) climate policy objectives. Through a strategic analysis encompassing the interior of coal mines, the surrounding environment, and the macro environment, this study elucidates the complex dynamics involved in methane emissions and capture initiatives. The key findings include a declining trend in absolute methane emissions since 2008, despite fluctuations in coal extraction volumes, and a relatively stable level of methane capture exceeding 300 million m3/year since 2014. The analysis underscores the critical role of government support, both in terms of financial incentives and streamlined regulatory processes, to facilitate the integration of methane capture technologies into coal mining operations. Collaboration through partnerships and stakeholder engagement emerges as essential for overcoming resource competition and ensuring the long-term success of methane capture projects. This paper also highlights the economic and environmental opportunities presented by methane reserves, emphasizing the importance of investment in efficient extraction technologies. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, particularly regarding the low efficiency of current de-methanation technologies. Recommendations for modernization and technological innovation are proposed to enhance methane capture efficiency and utilization.
“…[2]. Accurate measurement and measurement of the quality of water resources and changes in carbon sinks in mining areas is a necessary link in formulating environmental governance measures and comprehensively accounting for the environmental cost of coal mining [3].…”
The global ecological environment is fragile, and large-scale coal mining has accelerated the loss of water resources, but it is difficult to quantify its impact. Studies have found that large-scale coal mining has a particularly large impact on the underflow zone of rivers, but blind mining affects environmental damage and loses the water volume of the river. The lack of a compensation mechanism for water damage caused by coal mining often exacerbates the province’s fragile water environment. This paper analyzes the prediction of the impact of coal mining on the underflow zone of the river. First of all, determine the mining area of the mine and collect and collect data. Then, the lost water volume was calculated as a predicted score using the double integro-differential equation. Finally, the GA-BiLSTM model is proposed to predict the lost water capacity. The experimental results show that the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square (RMSE), and prediction pass rate are 11.78/%, 24.87/%, and 92/%, respectively, and the average relative error is only 9.98%. Compared with BP, SVM, LSTM, Bi-LSTM neural network model has better prediction accuracy. The experimental results also show that the model has good reliability and practicability, which can provide a new idea and method for the new analysis of the impact of coal mining on the underflow zone of the river.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.