2005
DOI: 10.2968/061001012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bait-and-switch cleanup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many locals whose efforts to close the plant spanned decades, refuge opposition was inseparable from criticism of cleanup. As cleanup wound down, Moore (who had campaigned against the plant since 1979) contended that if the site's intended future use had been residential, farmland or public park, the operation would have been more rigorous: refuge status was an 'excuse for a cheaper cleanup' (Moore, 2005).…”
Section: Cleaning Up the Messmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many locals whose efforts to close the plant spanned decades, refuge opposition was inseparable from criticism of cleanup. As cleanup wound down, Moore (who had campaigned against the plant since 1979) contended that if the site's intended future use had been residential, farmland or public park, the operation would have been more rigorous: refuge status was an 'excuse for a cheaper cleanup' (Moore, 2005).…”
Section: Cleaning Up the Messmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that matter, the long-term effects of plutonium contamination on wildlife remains an ecological concern. In any event, the 1995 recommendation of the Future Site Uses Working Group for eventual cleanup to background levels was disregarded in the final cleanup (Moore, 2005).…”
Section: Office [Us Gao] 2006)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOE and regulators, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) had to ensure that the cleanup met the level required to protect a wildlife refuge worker. The refuge worker provided a`risk fix' essential to the successful turnover of the site (Moore, 2005). Compared with future use as housing or farming, wildlife refuge designation enabled a cheaper, faster cleanup due to the limited human contact entailed by this end-state scenario.…”
Section: Refuge Fixmentioning
confidence: 99%