1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14273.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bain, ADE, and Enclosed Magill breathing systems A comparative study during controlled ventilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that, although there are well-documented advantages of the EAR during spontaneous ventilation [13,14], there may be little difference in clinical efficiency between the above systems during controlled ventilation. This agrees with the work of Criswell and colleagues, who found only a small difference in PE' COI values in patients during ventilation with an EAR system and the Bain (0.35 kPa), and concluded that they were of similar clinical efficiency [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that, although there are well-documented advantages of the EAR during spontaneous ventilation [13,14], there may be little difference in clinical efficiency between the above systems during controlled ventilation. This agrees with the work of Criswell and colleagues, who found only a small difference in PE' COI values in patients during ventilation with an EAR system and the Bain (0.35 kPa), and concluded that they were of similar clinical efficiency [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From figure 3, the mean VF required to maintain this value of PE' CO , was 66 ml kg" 1 min" 1 , while a VF of 70 ml kg" 1 min" 1 produced mild hypocapnia. Allowing for differences in methodology, these results are in agreement with those of Keeri-Szanto [1], Miller and Miller [4] and Chriswell and colleagues [15], but not with those of Bruce and Soni [16] whose prototype EAR required a mean VF of 100 ml kg" 1 min" 1 to maintain a mean PE'CO, of 5.0 kPa. The latter suggest that the inefficiency of their system was caused by the expiratory valve opening prematurely, allowing fresh gas to displace deadspace gas stored in the inspiratory tube.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…1). A defective valve in the EAR system tested by Bruce and Soni [9] may have resulted in their finding somewhat smaller (although significant) differences in end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressures between patients during ventilation of the lungs with the EAR and the Bain system [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Humphrey 1983; This system combines the Mapleson A (in its Lack format), D and E systems and several studies in adult paients have confirmed its effectiveness as an anaesthetic breathing system in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients (Dixon, Chakrabati & Morgan 1984;Shulman & Brodsky 1984;Artru & Katz 1987), and during controlled ventilation (Shulman & Brodsky 1984;Artru & Katz 1987;Criswell et al 1990). However, in one study (Shah, Loughlin & Bedford 1989) the Bain system was found to be more efficient.…”
Section: Semi-closed Rebreathing System (Maples 0 N )mentioning
confidence: 99%