1951
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(51)90005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bacterial surface IV. Effect of streptomycin on the electrophoretic mobility of escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in the zeta-potential of the antibiotic-treated bacte ria reflected the decrease in the negative charge of the bacterial surface. This finding is in agreement with a report by McQuillen [12], who found that S. aureus grown in the pres ence of penicillin G showed a progressive de crease in negative electrical charge. Since the antibiotic-treated cells were washed before the measurement of the zeta-potential, no an tibiotics could be adsorbed onto the bacterial surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The decrease in the zeta-potential of the antibiotic-treated bacte ria reflected the decrease in the negative charge of the bacterial surface. This finding is in agreement with a report by McQuillen [12], who found that S. aureus grown in the pres ence of penicillin G showed a progressive de crease in negative electrical charge. Since the antibiotic-treated cells were washed before the measurement of the zeta-potential, no an tibiotics could be adsorbed onto the bacterial surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Humphrey & Lightbown (1952) found that the absorption of streptomycin by staphylococci follows the Freundlich type ( X = 20.4 CooZ4) over the range of concentration examined, though saturation is expected to be achieved at higher concentrations (see Clarke, 1933). The electrophoretic mobility of staphylococci with absorbed streptomycin (studied by McQuillen, 1951), showed agreement with the Langmuir isotherm. A certain minimum external concentration is necessary to saturate sufficient active sites in order to inhibit division and in the case of staphylococci and streptomycin is reached before saturation.…”
Section: K E Cooper a H Linton And S N Sehgalmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The use of Humphrey & Lightbown's (1952) adsorption formula is justified for concentrations from 0 to 100 units, because although McQuillen (1951) by electrophoresis experiments showed that streptomycin adsorption on the surface of staphylococci fitted a Langmuir adsorption isotherm, saturation was not reached until over 1000 units were absorbed, and the part of the curve from 5 to 70 yo saturation was fitted accurately by the Freundlich straight line (see Clarke, 1933).…”
Section: K E Cooper a H Linton And S N Sehgalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of a cell suspension were agitated with 4 g. of glass ballotini beads, no. 12, with a Mickle shaker (Mickle, 1948;Mitchell & Moyle, 1951b). The concentration of cells was up to 25 mg. dry wt./ml.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%