2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00807.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bacterial gene lfpA influences the potent induction of calcitonin receptor and osteoclast-related genes in Burkholderia pseudomallei-induced TRAP-positive multinucleated giant cells

Abstract: SummaryBurkholderia pseudomallei is a facultative intracellular pathogen and the causative agent of melioidosis, a spectrum of potentially fatal diseases endemic in Northern Australia and South-East Asia. We demonstrate that B. pseudomallei rapidly modifies infected macrophage-like cells in a manner analagous to osteoclastogenesis. These alterations include multinucleation and the expression by infected cells of mRNA for factors required for osteoclastogenesis: the chemokines monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(108 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In considering how these and earlier observations might be related, a closer look at the process of plaque formation itself is revealing. Bp, Bm, and Bt induce cell fusion and multinucleate giant cell (MNGC) formation with remarkable efficiency in a variety of cell types (2,10,25). In observing cell monolayers following nanoblade delivery, we often noticed the appearance of MNGCs in areas that developed to become plaques.…”
Section: T3ssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering how these and earlier observations might be related, a closer look at the process of plaque formation itself is revealing. Bp, Bm, and Bt induce cell fusion and multinucleate giant cell (MNGC) formation with remarkable efficiency in a variety of cell types (2,10,25). In observing cell monolayers following nanoblade delivery, we often noticed the appearance of MNGCs in areas that developed to become plaques.…”
Section: T3ssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this process (7,24,28). To date, both BipB and RpoS have been implicated in B. pseudomallei-induced MNGC formation in murine macrophage cell lines (54,58).…”
Section: Vol 78 2010 Interactions Of B Mallei T6s Mutants With Macmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mallei and B. pseudomallei are known to cause MNGC formation both in vitro and in vivo (7,11,20,24,28,49). At present, the relevance of MNGCs with respect to virulence is unclear; however, it has been proposed that giant cells may provide these pathogens with an immune-privileged niche in which to survive and replicate within a host (7). The formation MNGCs from mononuclear cells is thought to be a result of cell fusion events; however, very little is known about the bacterial and host cell factors that are involved in 96 BURTNICK ET AL.…”
Section: Vol 78 2010 Interactions Of B Mallei T6s Mutants With Macmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have previously shown that an acapsulate B. pseudomallei mutant is capable of infecting nasal-associated lymphoid tissue and, presumably, DCs also (Owen et al, 2009). Similarly, acapsulate B. thailandensis is capable of invasion and replication in murine phagocytic cells, albeit with an altered host-cell response (Boddey et al, 2007), and the capacity of B. thailandensis to induce lung damage, suggested to be mediated, in part, by inflammatory cytokine production, have been reported (West et al, 2008). In the present study, we assessed whether the presence of capsular polysaccharide affects bacterial survival and found that neither the acapsular mutant of B. pseudomallei nor a strain of B. thailandensis differed from capsulate B. pseudomallei in their interactions with MDDCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, imipenem is lipid insoluble and penetrates cells poorly if at all (Menashe et al, 2008;Murdoch & Peterson, 1991;Sahly et al, 2008). Numerous other studies have used imipenem (Boddey et al, 2007;Brown et al, 2004;MacDonald & Speert, 2008) rather than kanamycin. We have compared the effects of Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%