The backroads of AI: The uneven geographies of artificial intelligence and development

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is being reconfigured as a set of technologies that can address poverty with precision. The impacts of AI will both exacerbate and ameliorate the conditions of uneven development. Recent debates focus on the disruptive effects of AI, particularly to replication of development trajectories that have had success in reducing poverty. In this paper we further these debates by analysing the backroads of AI. The backroads serve as a metaphor for understanding the ways AI will travel from the sites of incubation to the frontlines of uneven development. We explore dialogues between AI and development in two arenas: the World Bank's Development Impact Evaluation initiative (DIME) and the Government of India's national AI strategy, #AIforAll. We argue that both these arenas serve as hubs from which AI will travel out along the backroads to remote, poor, and fragmented polities. While the World Bank utilises AI as technology to empower experts and mobilise a techno-political authority, what we refer to as precision AI, India seeks to function as a second-tier AI hub, making AI cheaper and more accessible domestically and for other developing countries, what we refer to as populist AI. We conclude by discussing the interrelations of precision and populist AI along the backroads, and the potential of backroads research for mapping AI, uneven geographies of development and technology and the impacts of AI's disruptions at different scales.

The Social Life of Robots: The Politics of Algorithms, Governance, and Sovereignty

“…Geographers are well positioned to explicate how these changes will be realised differently across different spaces and vis‐a‐vis different bodies, and how spaces will develop differently as a result. How does technology such as robots and machine learning “travel” from hubs of production such as Beijing, Hangzhou, and Silicon Valley to sites of application around the globe (McDuie‐Ra and Gulson )? As Faroohar () documents, although divided by political philosophy, these locations are engaged in mutual co‐production, with western technology seeking entry to China and vice versa, so that for example surveillance technologies boomerang back to the west via China.…”

“…Amoore and Raley ), and how these technologies may “travel” from hubs to sites of application (e.g. McDuie‐Ra and Gulson ). This symposium takes as its point of departure the role of these technologies and their associated materialities in making and remaking the structures, conditions, and relations of everyday life.…”

Existence of asymmetry between wages and automatable jobs: a quantile regression approach

“…Similar to the aforementioned studies, AI-driven automation has a productivity-enhancing potential and hence the growth in employment (Ernst et al, 2019). While AI is expected to solve social and economic issues, the disruption challenges brought about by AI-driven automation is also evident (Elish and Boyd, 2018;McDuie-Ra and Gulson, 2019). Since the adoption of AI-driven technologies is still low, its effect is yet to be materialized.…”

Responsibility, care and repair in/of AI: Extinction threats and more-than-real worlds

“…Within geographic research, the contradictory processes of AI are examined in varying contexts, most successfully when emplaced. For example, McDuie-Ra and Gulson (2020) analyse how AI has the potential to both reduce and exacerbate current realities of uneven development. In a case study on AI in India in the context of development interventions, McDuie-Ra and Gulson (2020) propose a distinction between precision AI, operated by the World Bank, and populist AI that is a 'second-tier' digital technology assemblage, a form of good enough tech from and for Indian citizens to use.…”