1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0118.1992.tb01190.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Baby Makers: An In‐Depth Single‐Case Study of Conscious and Unconscious Psychological Reactions to Infertility and ‘Baby‐Making’ Technology

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Recent innovations of interventive technologies of fertilisation (AIH, AID, IVF) have brought in their wake a wave of psychological reactions in the consumers. This new syndrome includes psychological symptoms such as derealisation, depersonalisation, hypochondria, low self‐esteem, guilt and neurotic depression; anxiety reactions; phobic avoidance and obsessional reactions with rumination and compulsive rituals. In addition, considerable interpersonal stress is manifested within the marital/intimate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical examples show that, whereas for the toddler gender only becomes significant retrospectively, it is in the parents’ minds from the start. Long before the birth each partner's daydreams and aspirations reflect sedimented residues from their respective transgenerational subculture, including attitudes to their own sex, and gender injunctions of archaic primary caregivers (Raphael‐Leff 1992, 1993, 2000b, 2002). Although hormonal influences on gender dimorphic structures of the brain are complex, whatever the biochemical moulding of the physiological substrata and foetal ‘raw material’ during gestation, they are psychically primed by maternal emotions and experience, including expectations, unconscious desires and projections 3 .…”
Section: Sex Gender and Gender Identity Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical examples show that, whereas for the toddler gender only becomes significant retrospectively, it is in the parents’ minds from the start. Long before the birth each partner's daydreams and aspirations reflect sedimented residues from their respective transgenerational subculture, including attitudes to their own sex, and gender injunctions of archaic primary caregivers (Raphael‐Leff 1992, 1993, 2000b, 2002). Although hormonal influences on gender dimorphic structures of the brain are complex, whatever the biochemical moulding of the physiological substrata and foetal ‘raw material’ during gestation, they are psychically primed by maternal emotions and experience, including expectations, unconscious desires and projections 3 .…”
Section: Sex Gender and Gender Identity Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though Linda was able to keep herself balanced by having analysis her failed attempts were in effect a last effort before seeking adoption. In her psychoanalytic work with fertility-challenged females, Raphael-Leff (1991) writes of the 'discovery of internal space (rather than a hole)'. For Charlene and Lucy 'empty space' was a symbolic equation to a kind of death, whereas for Linda it became a point of difference to disassociate from other females as a primary defence.…”
Section: The Spiral In Developmental and Archetypal Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%