2017
DOI: 10.1080/03081079.2017.1308360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The axiomatic characterizations onL-fuzzy covering-based approximation operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let µ, ν be L-fuzzy sets in X. The subsethood degree [37][38][39][40] of µ, ν, denoted by S X (µ, ν), is defined by…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let µ, ν be L-fuzzy sets in X. The subsethood degree [37][38][39][40] of µ, ν, denoted by S X (µ, ν), is defined by…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1936, Birkhoff and von Neumann [20] considered the orthomodular lattice as quantum logic for studying the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics. There are many extensions of Pawlak's rough set, such as fuzzy rough sets [21,22], covering based rough sets [23][24][25], probabilistic rough sets [26,27], soft rough sets [28][29][30][31], Diophantine fuzzy rough sets [32][33][34][35], multi-granulation rough sets [36][37][38], hesitant fuzzy rough set [39] and so on. However, as far as I know, there is only a little literature addressing the rough sets and quantum logics together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Fuzzy) rough sets are closely related to (fuzzy) topology [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. e well-known result may be that there is a one-toone correspondence between reflexive and transitive (fuzzy) approximation spaces and quasidiscrete (fuzzy) topological spaces [26,37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%