The avian somatosensory system

Wild, J. Martin

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819770-7.00018-9

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 94 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3. A-C ) 5,24 . Given the variation of body regions represented in somatotopic responses, from the beak and bill alone in pigeons 5 and finches 8 to the entire body surface in barn owls 27 and budgerigars 7 , we wondered to what extent the hummingbird basorostralis followed either pattern.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Discrete somatotopic representation and neural response properties in hummingbird and zebra finch forebrain nuclei

Gaede,

Wu,

Leitch

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummarySomatosensation allows animals to perceive the external world through touch, providing critical information about physical contact, temperature, pain, and body position. Somatosensory pathways, particularly those related to the rodent vibrissae, have been well-studied in mammals, illuminating principles of cortical organization and sensory processing1,2. However, comparative studies across diverse vertebrate species are imperative to understand how somatosensory systems are shaped by evolutionary pressures and specialized ecological needs.Birds provide an excellent model for studying the evolution of somatosensation, as they exhibit remarkable diversity in body plans, sensory capabilities, and behavior. Prior work in pigeons3-6, parrots7, and finches8have identified general tactile-responsive regions within the avian telencephalon. Yet how somatosensory maps and response properties vary across key avian groups remains unclear. Here, we aimed to elucidate somatotopic organization and neural coding in the telencephalon of Anna’s hummingbirds (Calypte anna) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).Usingin vivoextracellular electrophysiological techniques, we recorded single and multi-unit activity in telencephalic regions of anesthetized hummingbirds and finches. We stimulated the beak, face, trunk, wings, and hindlimbs with controlled tactile stimuli and mapped somatosensory receptive fields. We found distinct representations of body regions distributed across multiple somatosensory zones, with surprising differences in relative areas devoted to key body surfaces, potentially as related to behavioral significance.Highlights□Somatosensation provides birds with critical information for behaviors necessary to survival including foraging and flight.□In vivoextracellular physiological recordings were used to monitor tactile responses in contralateral forebrain nuclei corresponding to the feather deflection in hummingbirds and finches including to air puff stimuli.□Both hummingbirds and finches show distinct separation of body and head receptive field representation in different nuclei.□A continuous somatotopic arrangement can be found in both the rostral Wulst (corresponding to the wings and body) and in nucleus basorostralis (corresponding to the head and beak), with particularly enlarged representations of the wing leading edge and the foot.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Visually responsive areas of the hyperpallium (Wulst) receive input via the thalamofugal system, whereas somatosensory Wulst is the target of ascending fibers from a dorsal thalamic nucleus (nucleus dorsalis intermedius ventralis anterior, DIVA) 22,23 . DIVA itself is the target of the dorsal column nuclei 24 .…”

Section: Central Organization Of the Rostral Wulstmentioning

confidence: 99%