2016
DOI: 10.1080/03081087.2016.1164660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The average number of critical rank-one approximations to a tensor

Abstract: Motivated by the many potential applications of low-rank multiway tensor approximations, we set out to count the rank-one tensors that are critical points of the distance function to a general tensor v. As this count depends on v, we average over v drawn from a Gaussian distribution, and find a formula that relates this average to problems in random matrix theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we present a brief account of recent work on multidimensional tensors of rank one [14]. For these, the ED degree is computed in [15], and the average ED degree is computed in [10]. Our discussion includes partially symmetric tensors, and it represents a step towards extending the Eckart-Young theorem from matrices to tensors.…”
Section: Tensors Of Rank Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we present a brief account of recent work on multidimensional tensors of rank one [14]. For these, the ED degree is computed in [15], and the average ED degree is computed in [10]. Our discussion includes partially symmetric tensors, and it represents a step towards extending the Eckart-Young theorem from matrices to tensors.…”
Section: Tensors Of Rank Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of multidimensional tensors, while of equally fundamental importance, is much more involved. In Section 8, following [10,14,15], we give an account of recent results on the ordinary and average ED degree of the variety of rank one tensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8] Draisma and Horobet point out that application-oriented algorithms to compute the best rank-one approximations, or, more generally, the best low-rank approximations, are mostly of a local nature. Therefore, they face difficulties when close to nonminimal critical points of the distance function that one wants to minimize.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again for a sample of 100000 forms f , we have estimated the probabilities of the aleatory variables X f = (0, 2, 4) for d = 4, Y f = (1, 3, 5) for d = 5 and respectively X yfx−xfy = (0, 2, 4), Y yfx−xfy = (1, 3, 5) with respect to f and yf x − xf y and then relative expected values and we expect that E(X f ) ≈ √ d and E(X yfx−xfy ) ≈ √ 3d − 2 and the same for E(Y f ) and E(Y yfx−xfy ) (see Example 1.6 in [8] and Example 4.8 in [9]):…”
Section: Binary Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%