2006
DOI: 10.1134/s0965542506120050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The average dimension of a multidimensional function for quasi-Monte Carlo estimates of an integral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where m Ӷ d. Obviously, the ANOVA decomposition of (1.1) contains lowdimensional terms only: their dimensions cannot exceed m. Therefore, the average dimension of (1.1) also does not exceed m. The concept of average dimension was introduced by A. Owen in Liu and Owen (2006) and independently by Asotsky et al (2006). These papers contain an important suggestion: for integrands with small average dimension, QMC integrations are superior to MC integrations.…”
Section: Technical Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where m Ӷ d. Obviously, the ANOVA decomposition of (1.1) contains lowdimensional terms only: their dimensions cannot exceed m. Therefore, the average dimension of (1.1) also does not exceed m. The concept of average dimension was introduced by A. Owen in Liu and Owen (2006) and independently by Asotsky et al (2006). These papers contain an important suggestion: for integrands with small average dimension, QMC integrations are superior to MC integrations.…”
Section: Technical Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A year later the same concept was introduced in [1]. The integrals below are written without integration limits because all the variables vary independently from 0 to 1.…”
Section: A Appendixmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The use of such quasirandom sampling for numerical integration is referred to as "quasi-Monte Carlo" integration. Quasirandom sampling based on "scrambled nets" [18][19][20][21][22] has the property that, for "well-behaved" functions, the error becomes proportional to −3/2 log /2 , which is much less than the 1/( √ ) for traditional Monte Carlo integration. Section 5 will discuss quasi-Monte Carlo methods.…”
Section: Simulation For the Design Of Nanoscale Vlsi Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%