2016
DOI: 10.14214/sf.1441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The availability of cavity trees along an age gradient in fresh pine forests

Abstract: Highlights • The density of cavity trees in pine-dominated, managed forests varied in relation to stand age and was highest in stands older than 130 years of age. • Cavities excavated by woodpeckers dominated among all cavities. • The number of trees with cavities appears insufficient to ensure the effective protection of bird diversity in managed stands of Augustów Forest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cavity-nesting birds require trees with specific characteristics (e.g., species, size, trees available) and these tree species are generally the most logged by forestry companies (Martin & Eadie 1999, Cockle et al 2010, Politi et al 2010, Ruggera et al 2016, Schaaf et al 2019. Relatively few studies assessed the impact of forest management certification on the availability of cavities for secondary cavity-nesting birds (Zawadzka et al 2016). Thus, the objective of this study is to compare the impact of forest management under certification with unlogged forest sites and conventional logging on cavity availability for secondary cavity-nesting birds, in a subtropical forest of northwestern Argentina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavity-nesting birds require trees with specific characteristics (e.g., species, size, trees available) and these tree species are generally the most logged by forestry companies (Martin & Eadie 1999, Cockle et al 2010, Politi et al 2010, Ruggera et al 2016, Schaaf et al 2019. Relatively few studies assessed the impact of forest management certification on the availability of cavities for secondary cavity-nesting birds (Zawadzka et al 2016). Thus, the objective of this study is to compare the impact of forest management under certification with unlogged forest sites and conventional logging on cavity availability for secondary cavity-nesting birds, in a subtropical forest of northwestern Argentina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesting of the above five species in nest-boxes in conifer forest areas is therefore sporadic and probably results from deficiency of hollows in the examined area, but also attractiveness of nest-boxes as substitute for breeding places. in pine stands of augustów Forest aged 70-100 years the number of hollows is very small -0.7 hollows per ha -and in stands below 70 years hollows were found occasionally (Zawadzka et al 2016). When considered is above dependence, arranging nest-boxes in younger forest stands, where there is not enough breeding places for secondary holenesting birds, seems justified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in economy forests, availability of breeding places for secondary hole-nesting birds is limited, especially in forest stands of younger age class. nesting possibility of this group of birds is dependent on the presence of hollows which are essential for breeding (Walankiewicz et al 2014;Zawadzka et al 2016;Zawadzka 2018). the number of breeding places for secondary hole-nesting birds is regularly being increased by creating 'artificial hollows',that is, hanging nest-boxes (Jabłoński et al 1979;graczyk 1992;Zawadzka, Zawadzki 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It leads to forest fragmentation, the disappearance of a forest's natural structure, the shortening of the stand developmental cycle, and a reduction of the area of oldgrowth stage (e.g. Angelstam et al 2004;Lõhmus et al 2005;Zawadzka et al 2016). Other effects include a reduction of the volume of dead wood as well as an elimination of natural disturbance patterns and structures (Linder and Östlund 1998;Lindenmayer and McCarthy 2002;Bujoczek et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%