1965
DOI: 10.1190/1.1439636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Auxiliary Point Method of Electrical Sounding Interpretation, and Its Relationship to the Dar Zarrouk Parameters

Abstract: The so‐called “auxilliary point” method for the interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity soundings has received considerable attention from the European geophysicists. However, almost no mention of it has been made in the American literature. It is the aim of this paper to introduce the method and to establish its mathematical relationship to the so‐called “Dar Zarrouk” parameters. The auxiliary point method is an empirical graphical method by which a multilayer problem is progressively reduced to the simpl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soundings were conducted at points of anomaly quantitatively delineated from the EM profiles. Seventy (70) depth soundings were conducted, with maximum half-current electrode spacing (AB/2) of 100 m. The field curves were manually interpreted [22], using master curves [23] and auxiliary point charts [24][25]. Geoelectric parameters obtained frommanual interpretation were later used as a starting model for computer-assisted interpretation [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soundings were conducted at points of anomaly quantitatively delineated from the EM profiles. Seventy (70) depth soundings were conducted, with maximum half-current electrode spacing (AB/2) of 100 m. The field curves were manually interpreted [22], using master curves [23] and auxiliary point charts [24][25]. Geoelectric parameters obtained frommanual interpretation were later used as a starting model for computer-assisted interpretation [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reduction of the VES data to 1D geological models, manual and computer modeling techniques were utilized (Zohdy 1965;Zohdy et al 1974). Bi-logarithmic graphs were used to plot the computed apparent resistivities and curves were smoothened to remove the effects of lateral heterogeneities and other forms of noisy signatures (Chakravarthi et al 2007;Akpan et al 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), with maximum half current electrode spacing (AB/2) of 65m. The field data was interpreted by applying partial curve matching technique (Koefoed, 1979) with the help of master curves (Orellana and Mooney, 1966) and sets of auxiliary charts (Zohdy, 1965;Keller and Frischnecht, 1966). From the preliminary interpretation, initial estimates of the resistivity and thickness of the various geoelectric layers at each VES locations were determined.…”
Section: 2ves Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%