1996
DOI: 10.1016/1359-835x(95)00019-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The automated manufacture of prepreg broadgoods components — a review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The manufacturing is usually performed in a temperature-controlled environment with temperatures around 20°C. This is not an ideal temperature for the prepreg, but rather chosen for operator comfort [6].…”
Section: Manual Layupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturing is usually performed in a temperature-controlled environment with temperatures around 20°C. This is not an ideal temperature for the prepreg, but rather chosen for operator comfort [6].…”
Section: Manual Layupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the levels in the automation hierarchy are illustrated in Table 4. For composite manufacturing the main advantage with the use of automation is, according to Newell et al (1996), the possibility to increase overall quality and uniform consistency for the products. The layup and consolidation processes benefit significantly from a more repeatable process compared to manual layup .…”
Section: Manufacturing Systems and Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are requirements on contamination-free handling, positional accuracy of placed plies, requirements for gap/overlap, fiber angles, wrinkles and other deformations [7,[13][14][15][16][17]. • The systems must be designed to handle a multitude of ply shapes and sizes [14].…”
Section: Challenges and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%