2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT): Scientific Context, Study Design, and Progress Toward Biomarker Qualification

Abstract: Clinical research in neurodevelopmental disorders remains reliant upon clinician and caregiver measures. Limitations of these approaches indicate a need for objective, quantitative, and reliable biomarkers to advance clinical research. Extant research suggests the potential utility of multiple candidate biomarkers; however, effective application of these markers in trials requires additional understanding of replicability, individual differences, and intra-individual stability over time. The Autism Biomarkers … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were collected as part of the ongoing Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT 1 ; McPartland, 2016). Details of the ABC-CT data acquisition are reported elsewhere (Webb et al, 2019;McPartland et al, 2020). The objective of the ABC-CT is to evaluate a set of electrophysiological (EEG), eye-tracking, and behavioral measures for use in clinical trials for ASD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were collected as part of the ongoing Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT 1 ; McPartland, 2016). Details of the ABC-CT data acquisition are reported elsewhere (Webb et al, 2019;McPartland et al, 2020). The objective of the ABC-CT is to evaluate a set of electrophysiological (EEG), eye-tracking, and behavioral measures for use in clinical trials for ASD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have validated the clinical utility of the PDDBI for determining behavioral profiles of children with ASD to guide treatment decisions (Cohen & Flory, 2019;Schutte et al, 2019). The PDDBI has also been used as an outcome measure in quasiexperimental and randomized controlled intervention trials (Holzinger et al, 2019;Mankad et al, 2015) and has been included in an extensive phenotyping battery for an ongoing biomarker qualification study (McPartland et al, 2020). Given the strong psychometric properties of the PDDBI and its widespread use in the field, it is important to understand the agreement between raters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliably measuring change in social functioning over time and across development remains a daunting challenge for the field. Similarly, at present, there are no validated early biomarkers for ASD in general that are clearly stable, reliable, and capture clinical change—though there is important ongoing work in this area [ 151 , 165 – 167 ]. In addition, the likelihood of small numbers of individuals in any clinical trial of this type would render the current strategies of comparing group means to assess ASD treatment efficacy quite challenging.…”
Section: Application To Clinical Care and Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%