The authors reply

Kreutziger, Janett; Hornung, Sonja; Harrer, Clemens; Urschl, Wilhelm; Doppler, Reinhard; Voelckel, Wolfgang G.; Trimmel, Helmut

doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004188

Critical Care Medicine

2020

DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004188

|View full text |Cite

The authors reply

Janett Kreutziger

Sonja Hornung

Clemens Harrer

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Preprint1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the included studies, 1284 patients underwent tracheal intubation: 655 (51%) patients were intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 629 (49%) with the Macintosh laryngoscope. All patients underwent elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation; only two articles included patients with potentially di cult airways[17,21]. Di cult airways were de ned those of obese patients or in emergency status.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: An updated systematic review

Sansone

Giaccari

Bonomo

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath video laryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of this last; the results were sometimes controversial. We performed a systematic review to compare the effectiveness between the McGrath video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in an adult population. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles in according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We have not included manikin trials and studies involving double-lumen tubes. 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh; 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes and adverse events incidence. We can assert that the McGrath video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: An updated systematic review

Sansone

Giaccari

Bonomo

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The authors reply

Cited by 1 publication

References 5 publications

Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: An updated systematic review

Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: An updated systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About