2011
DOI: 10.1159/000332579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry: Providing Patients in Austria with Unrelated Donors for Transplant – a Worldwide Cooperation

Abstract: Background: The Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry is the central search coordinating unit in charge of national and international donor searches in Austria. Patients and Methods: Between 1988 and 2010, a worldwide search for an unrelated donor of blood stem cells (URD) was initiated for 2,166 Austrian patients with haematological disorders, 1,671 adults and 495 children, by the Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry. Results: An URD was identified for 78.3% of the patients between 2008 and 2010, for 76.7% of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Principal Components Analysis (PCA) for 38 populations with HLA-B data available was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 19 software ( IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA ) to analyse the distribution of HLA-B alleles in human groups of the proposed ancestries, Figure 1 . PCA included population data of Ireland [20], NW of England [61], Germany [62], Austria [63]; Spain, Italy, United Kingdom [64], France [65], Gypsy from Andalucía (Spain; data collected by López-Nevot et al ) [14], Azores Terceira Island [66], Forro from São Tomé Island [67], Beti from Cameroon [68], Bandiagara from Mali, Lusaka from Zambia, Luo and Nandi from Kenia [69], Mandeka from Senegal [70], Guinea Bissau [71], Aleut from Bering Island (Russia) [72], center of Japan [73], a cord blood bank of Tzu Chi Foundation (Taiwan) [74], Han from southern China [60], north India [75], Kensiu from Malasya [76], Kinh from Vietnam [77], Tarahumara from northern Mexico [17], Native Americans from Gila River (USA) [78], Yu’pik from Alaska (USA) [79], Mixtec, Zapotec, and Mixe from Oaxaca (Mexico) [16], Seri from Sonora (Mexico) [80], Navajo from New Mexico (USA) [81], Uro from Titikaka Lake (Peru) [82], and Toba from Rosario (Argentina; data collected by Cintia Marcos et al ) [14]. Also, two admixed populations from Mexico were included: a “Mexican Mestizo” sample [83] and a sample from Guadalajara City, western Mexico [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal Components Analysis (PCA) for 38 populations with HLA-B data available was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 19 software ( IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA ) to analyse the distribution of HLA-B alleles in human groups of the proposed ancestries, Figure 1 . PCA included population data of Ireland [20], NW of England [61], Germany [62], Austria [63]; Spain, Italy, United Kingdom [64], France [65], Gypsy from Andalucía (Spain; data collected by López-Nevot et al ) [14], Azores Terceira Island [66], Forro from São Tomé Island [67], Beti from Cameroon [68], Bandiagara from Mali, Lusaka from Zambia, Luo and Nandi from Kenia [69], Mandeka from Senegal [70], Guinea Bissau [71], Aleut from Bering Island (Russia) [72], center of Japan [73], a cord blood bank of Tzu Chi Foundation (Taiwan) [74], Han from southern China [60], north India [75], Kensiu from Malasya [76], Kinh from Vietnam [77], Tarahumara from northern Mexico [17], Native Americans from Gila River (USA) [78], Yu’pik from Alaska (USA) [79], Mixtec, Zapotec, and Mixe from Oaxaca (Mexico) [16], Seri from Sonora (Mexico) [80], Navajo from New Mexico (USA) [81], Uro from Titikaka Lake (Peru) [82], and Toba from Rosario (Argentina; data collected by Cintia Marcos et al ) [14]. Also, two admixed populations from Mexico were included: a “Mexican Mestizo” sample [83] and a sample from Guadalajara City, western Mexico [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall median search duration was 20 days (7–330), 45 days (7–1225), and 477 (2–2870) days in patients groups with high, low and very low search success probabilities, respectively [ 13 ]. A recent Austrian study reported that a 9-10/10 (exceptionally a 8/10) matched donor could be identified for 78.3% of the patients (87.7% of European origin) in 2008–2010 searches, with a mean search time of 1.84 months in 2010 [ 18 ].…”
Section: Efficiency Of the Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretransplantation evaluation of a patient can be a prolonged and complicated process that often involves patient counseling, careful consideration of risks and benefits, frequent medical and logistic reassessments, and consideration of out-of-pocket expenses. Preparing a patient for HCT can also depend on disease response to initial treatment, and in the case of allogeneic transplantation, donor search can take a few months, particularly for non-Caucasian ethnic groups [12,13,16]. These factors can lengthen the time between the determination that HCT is recommended and when it actually occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%