The auroral oval during the substorm development

Vorobjev, V. G.; Starkov, G. V.; Feldstein, Y. I.

doi:10.1016/0032-0633(76)90007-6

Cited by 39 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A pro- (Vorobjev et al, 1976b). nounced equatorward displacement of dayside auroras was observed before T 0 .…”

Section: Behaviour Of the Discrete Auroral Formsmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Such kind of study was carried out for the first time by , and then in more detail by Vorobjev et al (1976b). With numerous events it was shown that, inside the auroral oval boundaries, the dayside rayed auroral forms move predominantly poleward, just like prior to magnetospheric substorms and when substorms are in the progress.…”

Section: Auroral Luminosity In the Daytime Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Vorobjev et al ( , 1976b were the first who carried out a detailed analysis of the dayside discrete auroral forms during periods of substorms. They also studied concurrently the dynamics of the dayside auroras according to observations of the Pyramida station (PYR, = 74.8 • , MLT = UT + 2.5) and the nightside auroras with observations from the eastern part of Russia and from Alaska during the IGY.…”

Section: Behaviour Of the Discrete Auroral Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They also studied concurrently the dynamics of the dayside auroras according to observations of the Pyramida station (PYR, = 74.8 • , MLT = UT + 2.5) and the nightside auroras with observations from the eastern part of Russia and from Alaska during the IGY. Figure 22 illustrates typical auroral behaviour using the example of a substorm during the interval 08:00-13:00 UT on 18 December 1957 (Vorobjev et al, 1976b). The positions of the various auroral forms along the geomagnetic meridian were obtained every minute from all-sky cameras under the assumption that the auroral heights were at 150 and 110 km on the dayside and nightside, respectively.…”

Section: Behaviour Of the Discrete Auroral Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Investigations of the auroral luminosity distribution and the dynamics of discrete auroral forms in a historical retrospective

Feldstein

Vorobjev

Zverev

et al. 2014

Hist. Geo Space. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A pro- (Vorobjev et al, 1976b). nounced equatorward displacement of dayside auroras was observed before T 0 .…”

Section: Behaviour Of the Discrete Auroral Formsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Auroral Luminosity In the Daytime Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Behaviour Of the Discrete Auroral Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Behaviour Of the Discrete Auroral Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Investigations of the auroral luminosity distribution and the dynamics of discrete auroral forms in a historical retrospective

Feldstein

Vorobjev

Zverev

et al. 2014

Hist. Geo Space. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As the newly formed space-science community focused their attention on models of sun, solar wind, and magnetosphere interaction, the workhorse all-sky cameras provided a continuing source of information about the auroral formation during geomagnetic substorms (AKASOFU et al, 1973;FELDSTEIN, 1974;GERARD, 1974;VOROBJEV, 1974;NAGATA et al, 1975;VOROBJEV et al, 1975;and VOROBJEV et al, 1976). Of particular interest is HORWIT and AKASOFU'S (1977) study of the response of dayside aurora and the interplanetary magnetic field to substorms.…”

Section: Auroral Electrojet Current and Luminositymentioning

confidence: 99%

Highlights in the studies of the relationship of geomagnetic field changes to auroral luminosity.

Campbell¹

1978

J. geomagn. geoelec

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the middle of the 18th century Celsius observed that there was a correspondence between a great aurora in Europe and the extreme motion of his observed compass needle. By the nineteenth century it was well established that the geomagnetic field always fluctuated violently at the height of an auroral display, that the high latitude zones of peak field disturbance and luminosity had similar locations, and that there were concurrent solar cycle changes in activity levels for the two phenomena. After the International Geophysical Year of 1957 to 1959 the correspondence of the ionospheric electrojet currents and auroral forms became a focus of observational programs. In these recent times the studies of a relationship between short-period pulsations of the geomagnetic field and luminosity pulsations (or the pulsations of bombarding, low energy electrons causing the auroral intensity changes) appeared prominently in the literature. A summary of the scientific progress in the study of these phenomena is presented in this paper.

show abstract

Auroral and Magnetic Variations in the Polar Cusp and Cleft — Signatures of Magnetopause Boundary-Layer Dynamics

Sandholt¹,

Egeland²

1988

Plasma and the Universe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The auroral oval during the substorm development

Cited by 39 publications

References 22 publications

Investigations of the auroral luminosity distribution and the dynamics of discrete auroral forms in a historical retrospective

Investigations of the auroral luminosity distribution and the dynamics of discrete auroral forms in a historical retrospective

Highlights in the studies of the relationship of geomagnetic field changes to auroral luminosity.

Auroral and Magnetic Variations in the Polar Cusp and Cleft — Signatures of Magnetopause Boundary-Layer Dynamics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About