2022
DOI: 10.22323/2.21010203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The audience experience of science storytelling: impact profiles from a Q methodology study

Abstract: The Story Collider applies the principles of narrative transportation to produce events that use first-person, personal stories about science to activate audience emotion, empathy, and identities. This study sought to systematically explore underlying patterns in the subjective experience of these live shows. This study combined a research framework from the performing arts with Q methodology, a method designed to capture and quantify subjectivity of personal meaning. This revealed four profiles, each represen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation methods included: youth personal meaning maps, youth video journals, post‐event engagement surveys, during‐event embedded activities, mural discussion groups, follow‐up surveys in the final year of the program and, importantly for a comprehensive look at effects, Ripple Effect Mapping, which is explained and detailed further below. (See the project evaluation report for a full detail of all methods and findings; Sickler & Lentzner, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation methods included: youth personal meaning maps, youth video journals, post‐event engagement surveys, during‐event embedded activities, mural discussion groups, follow‐up surveys in the final year of the program and, importantly for a comprehensive look at effects, Ripple Effect Mapping, which is explained and detailed further below. (See the project evaluation report for a full detail of all methods and findings; Sickler & Lentzner, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they completed reflection videos at the end of their internship. More details are available in Sickler & Lentzner, 2022.…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na Tabela 1 são descritos os resultados da análise Q após a rotação dos fatores. Os números destacados nas colunas indicam que a classificação das respostas de um respondente carregou significativamente e foram sinalizadas dentro de cada fator e identificadas como "pontuação de carregamento" em um local específico se significativo em p<0,05 (Sickler & Lentzner, 2022;Watts & Stenner, 2012). Desta forma, cada fator final resultante representa um grupo de pontos de vista com elevada correlação entre si (Watts & Stenner, 2012;Zabala & Pascual, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Essa relação significativa entre a ordenação Q e o tipo de fator foi associada a cada fator calculado como a média ponderada dos Q-sorts. Elas permitem uma caracterização de cada fator, pois forneceram a solução mais forte em termos de clareza (minimiza as afirmações não-carregadas ou que carregam em mais de um fator), de estabilidade (mantém os clusters de tipos consistentemente semelhantes) e de distinção (os fatores que não estão muito fortemente correlacionados uns com os outros) (Sickler & Lentzner, 2022) (Tabela 1). Em síntese, a análise fatorial Q realizada no estudo ora relatado permitiu a identificação de quatro fatores em relação aos arranjos de respostas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation