2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6404/ab1670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aubry–André model as a hobbyhorse for understanding the localization phenomenon

Abstract: We present a thorough pedagogical analysis of the single particle localization phenomenon in a quasiperiodic lattice in one dimension. Description of disorder in the lattice is represented by the Aubry-André model. Characterization of localization is performed through the analysis of both, stationary and dynamical properties. The stationary properties investigated are the inverse participation ratio (IPR), the normalized participation ratio (NPR) and the energy spectrum as a function of the disorder strength. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that in the extended regime (W 1) the asymptotic Q 0 scales as 1/N . This behavior is consistent with the more standard definition of IPR in a delocalize regime [13,26]. It shows that the initial excitation can spread all over the chain.…”
Section: Scalingsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observe that in the extended regime (W 1) the asymptotic Q 0 scales as 1/N . This behavior is consistent with the more standard definition of IPR in a delocalize regime [13,26]. It shows that the initial excitation can spread all over the chain.…”
Section: Scalingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This model, from now on HHAA, was generalized by Aubry and André [17,18] who found that eigenstates are extended under a weak incommensurate potential but become localized at certain potential strength. This transition could be observed through the convergence of a perturbative expansion [19,18], through the exponential decay of the Landauer conductance, [20,21] or by evaluating the inverse participation ratio (IPR) of the eigenstates [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Consequently, 1d incommensurate models have been frequently studied to mimic the Anderson transition of high dimensional disordered systems [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the KR system, the existence of localizationdelocalization transition (LDT) in the dynamics has been investigated in the kicked Harper model (KHM), whose classical counterpart is a non-integrable system. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] There are three main dynamical states of the quantum wave packet, localized, normal diffusion, and ballistic spread, corresponding to the change of the potential strength. In that respect, it is the same as the Harper model without the kicks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aubry-André model has quasiperiodic disorder [23][24][25][26][27], so is contrary to the Anderson model where the disorder is random, in one-dimension (1D), and for a single particle, it can present both localized and delocalized regimes. All states in the Aubry-André model become localized only above a critical disorder strength, while in the one-particle 1D infinite Anderson model, all states are localized for any disorder strength [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%