2013
DOI: 10.11120/ndir.2013.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Attitudes Towards, and Experiences of, Laboratory Teaching in Year 1 Chemistry and Physics University Courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of all the predictors, only the laboratory method is significant. This finding affirms the position of Brusa and Lupardus (2020), Piliang andDamopolii (2021), andSneddon andDouglas (2013) that students appreciate laboratory learning as a means to develop knowledge and skills. This goes further to explain why the students performed creditably in geometry with the use of the laboratory method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Of all the predictors, only the laboratory method is significant. This finding affirms the position of Brusa and Lupardus (2020), Piliang andDamopolii (2021), andSneddon andDouglas (2013) that students appreciate laboratory learning as a means to develop knowledge and skills. This goes further to explain why the students performed creditably in geometry with the use of the laboratory method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, there have been online experiments available, but this may not be sufficient which is why AL was seen to be relatively significant. Sneddon and Douglas [60] explained that the influence of the practical application of theoretical lessons would enhance the interest of students in the subject matter. Experiments should be presented and demonstrated as enjoyable, fun, and interesting in order to engage the students and gain their attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, there has been a limited number of research studies [14][15][16] conducted to explore the effectiveness of practical work in attaining the many aims discussed above on a number of tertiary science courses. However, research is still lacking on life science courses, like biology, zoology, botany and environmental sciences, which are also, by their nature, both hands and minds-on inquiry-based disciplines and as such, practical work has been considered an essential part of their curriculums.…”
Section: The Study Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%