1989
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)53391-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystem Of the EUTELSAT II Spacecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, the antenna inertia is sensibly lower than the inertia of the satellite main body and it does not induce significant motion. Designing the antenna control and the body control separately has been sufficient in the past (Bittner et al , 1982). Recently, however, the size and weight of the antennas of the satellites have been increasing and at the same time more precise pointing accuracy is required (Tham et al , 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, the antenna inertia is sensibly lower than the inertia of the satellite main body and it does not induce significant motion. Designing the antenna control and the body control separately has been sufficient in the past (Bittner et al , 1982). Recently, however, the size and weight of the antennas of the satellites have been increasing and at the same time more precise pointing accuracy is required (Tham et al , 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%