Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast

Abstract: Replication protein A (RPA) is a highly conserved single-stranded DNA-binding protein, required for cellular DNA replication, repair, and recombination. In human cells, RPA is phosphorylated during the S and G 2 phases of the cell cycle and also in response to ionizing or ultraviolet radiation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibits a similar pattern of cell cycle-regulated RPA phosphorylation, and our studies indicate that the radiation-induced reactions occur in yeast as well. We have examined yeast RPA phosphory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
163
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
6
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aberrant intermediates include hemireplicated and gapped molecules likely resulting from lagging strand defects (Lopes et al, 2001;Sogo et al, 2002). This hypothesis is supported by the findings that the lagging strand replication apparatus (the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex (pol-prim) and replication factor A (RFA)) is regulated in response to checkpoint activation (Brush et al, 1996;Pellicioli et al, 1999;Brush and Kelly, 2000), and that certain pol-prim and RFA mutants exhibit allele-specific checkpoint defects (Longhese et al, 1996;Marini et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These aberrant intermediates include hemireplicated and gapped molecules likely resulting from lagging strand defects (Lopes et al, 2001;Sogo et al, 2002). This hypothesis is supported by the findings that the lagging strand replication apparatus (the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex (pol-prim) and replication factor A (RFA)) is regulated in response to checkpoint activation (Brush et al, 1996;Pellicioli et al, 1999;Brush and Kelly, 2000), and that certain pol-prim and RFA mutants exhibit allele-specific checkpoint defects (Longhese et al, 1996;Marini et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this organism, the phosphorylation of RPA2 requires functional MEC1, an ATM homolog (Brush et al, 1996). In mammalian cells, both DNA-PK and ATM were implicated in DNA-damage induced phosphorylation of RPA2.…”
Section: The S Phase Checkpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Tel1p shares 45% amino acid identity in the kinase domain with ATM, and since TEL1 controls damage-induced phosphorylation of Rfa2p, Rad53p, and Rad9p in yeast (Brush et al, 1996;Sugimoto et al, 1997;Emili, 1998;Vialard et al, 1998), we asked whether Tel1p may modulate p53 in transfected A-T cells and, thus, contribute to the complementation of cellular phenotypes. Although p53 is bound and, thus, inactivated by a large T-antigen in SV40-transformed cells, a retained regulatory mechanism of p53 activity in SV40-transformed human cells has been suggested (Jung et al, 1997).…”
Section: Tel1 Expression Has No Effect On Basic and Irinduced P53 Stamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are required for phosphorylation of downstream proteins following DNA damage. IR-induced phosphorylation of p53, c-abl, and Rad51 in human cells is ATM dependent (Baskaran et al, 1997;Shafman et al, 1997;Banin et al, 1998;Canman et al, 1998;Kharbanda et al, 1998;Yuan et al, 1998), and TEL1 controls damage-induced phosphorylation of Rfa2p, Rad53p, and Rad9p in yeast (Brush et al, 1996;Sugimoto et al, 1997;Emili, 1998;Vialard et al, 1998). TEL1-deficient yeast cells express an A-T like genome instability that includes chromosome loss, hyperrecombination, and telomere shortening (Lustig and Petes, 1986;Greenwell et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%