2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2015.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The asymptotic k-SAT threshold

Abstract: MSC: 60C05, 05C80.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, however, we are concerned with the average case analysis of the Max-Cut problem. Last decade we have seen a dramatic progress improving our understanding of various randomly generated constraint satisfaction models such as the random K-SAT problem, the random XOR-SAT problem, proper coloring of a random graph, independence ratio of a random graph, and many related problems [8,9,20]. These problems broadly fall into the class of so-called anti-ferromagnetic spin glass models, borrowing a terminology from statistical physics.…”
Section: Context and Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, however, we are concerned with the average case analysis of the Max-Cut problem. Last decade we have seen a dramatic progress improving our understanding of various randomly generated constraint satisfaction models such as the random K-SAT problem, the random XOR-SAT problem, proper coloring of a random graph, independence ratio of a random graph, and many related problems [8,9,20]. These problems broadly fall into the class of so-called anti-ferromagnetic spin glass models, borrowing a terminology from statistical physics.…”
Section: Context and Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First we claim that W (x, 1/4) = 2w(x) for any x satisfying (5). For β = 1/4, it is easy to see from (7) and (8) that θ 1 = θ 2 and then t = x/2 follows from (9). Hence, it is the same computation scenario as the special setting in the beginning of Section 4.3, then W (x, 1/4) =2 log 2 − 4x 2 + log P(2θ(x), 1, 4x)…”
Section: Solving the Optimization Problem (112)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They explain many phenomena, most notably why some random CSP's are algorithmically very challenging (eg, [1,18]). Intuition gained from these hypotheses has led to some very impressive heuristics (eg, Survey Propogation [4,30,32], and the best of the random r-SAT algorithms whose performance has been rigorously proven [10]), and some remarkably tight rigorous bounds on various satisfiability thresholds [11][12][13][14]. Ding, Sly and Sun recently used an approach outlined by these hypotheses to prove the k-SAT conjecture [19], with a determination of the k-SAT satisfiability threshold for all large k. It is clear that, in order to approach many of the outstanding challenges around random CSP's, we need to understand clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%