The asylum-seeker discourse fed by political polarization in Turkey

Törenli, Nurcan; Kıyan, Zafer

doi:10.4324/9781003109891-17

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the case of lower governmental expectations, this dynamic also works through expecting Syrians to assimilate into the dominant culture (Danbold & Huo, 2022). Situated in the socio-politically polarized discursive context mostly driven by populist hate mongering (Törenli & Kıyan, 2021), we speculate that pro-diversity norms can backfire against the poorly managed process of settling Syrian asylum seekers. Indeed, previous evidence indicated that even reminding people of the international norms about Turkey's responsibility for asylum seekers creates a backlash effect (Cope & Crabtree, 2020).…”

Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…In certain contexts, such as highly segregated urban settlements and politically polarized societies like in Turkey (Aksel & İçduygu, 2018; Törenli & Kıyan, 2021), local community members may intentionally avoid contact with asylum seekers and migrants. This avoidance or lack of contact is often driven by a combination of factors, including a lack of trust and perceptions of threat associated with these groups (Duman, 2021; Şar & Kuru, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Locals’ support for integration policies and asylum seekers’ rights: Exploring a normative model of support for Syrians in Turkey

Duman,

Coşkan

2023

Studies Ethnicity & National

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Syrian asylum seekers in Turkey have been trying to adapt to their new life circumstances despite unclear integration and resettlement policies and high levels of discrimination and exclusion. We argue that fostering integration and asylum seekers’ rights requires a bottom‐up normative approach that considers members of the receiving society as active agents of these processes. Accordingly, in this study, we investigated the role of normative social context as well as sociopsychological antecedents among citizens of Turkey in facilitating their support for governmental integration policies and Syrian asylum seekers’ rights. A survey study was conducted with 202 residents in three cities, namely Bursa, Mardin, and Hatay, representing different geographical, ethnic, and cultural components in Turkey (i.e., Turkish, Kurdish, Arab, and Kurdish‐Arab). We specifically examined how citizens’ life concerns, perceptions of pro‐diversity norms in their city, and generalized attitudes toward minorities relate to their support for integration policies and Syrians’ rights. Furthermore, we tested the mediating roles of valuing intergroup contact with Syrians as well as accepting their presence and opposing their assimilation. Serial mediation analyses indicated that generalized positive feelings toward other minority groups predict higher support for integration policies, Syrians’ rights, as well as higher expectations of support for Syrians from fellow citizens, first through valuing contact with Syrians and second, through higher acceptance of Syrians’ stay and lower expectations of assimilation. However, perceptions of pro‐diversity norms predicted lower support for integration policies, Syrians’ rights, as well as lower expectations of support for Syrians from fellow citizens, first through devaluing contact with Syrians and second, through lower acceptance of Syrians’ stay and higher expectations of assimilation. These findings suggest that attitudes toward existing minority groups can define the social context and sociopsychological antecedents that would foster Syrians’ adaptation to life by taking on board members of the receiving society. However, they also indicate caution regarding the taken‐for‐granted role of pro‐diversity beliefs among the residents, especially in societies with complex intergroup relations.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%