2013
DOI: 10.2332/allergolint.13-oa-0535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Asthma Control Test, Japanese Version (ACT-J) as a Predictor of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guideline-Defined Asthma Control: Analysis of a Questionnaire-Based Survey

Abstract: ACT scores of ≥23 and ≤22 are useful for identifying patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma, respectively, as defined by GINA 2006, and the latter is more strongly predictive than the former. The reason for the higher cut-off point of the ACT-J relative to other versions of the ACT is unclear and warrants further investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The median ACT score in this study was 23 points. In our previous study, the optimum cut-off point for predicting Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-defined asthma control was 23 points (17). It was therefore considered appropriate to divide the asthma control group in this study into uncontrolled and controlled subgroups, with 23 points as the threshold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median ACT score in this study was 23 points. In our previous study, the optimum cut-off point for predicting Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-defined asthma control was 23 points (17). It was therefore considered appropriate to divide the asthma control group in this study into uncontrolled and controlled subgroups, with 23 points as the threshold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Asthma Control Test has been developed and validated as a test of appropriate assessment of asthma control, responsive to changes in asthma control over time, proven to be useful tool to the clinicians and easy to apply in everyday clinical care 8,16 . After validation of original ACT questionaire, the validation of ACT questionnaire its translations was reported in the last decade [17][18][19][20][21][22] . Although valida-tion methodology was different in these studies, the overall findings regarding the translated ACT versions were consistent, confirming its value to assess asthma control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reporting daytime and nighttime VAS, each patient continuously underwent the Japanese version of the ACT for adult asthmatics. 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%