2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The asteroid lightcurve database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
521
5
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 492 publications
(554 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
16
521
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason we belive the phase curve should be shifted downwards by about 0.45 mag, so that it coincides with our photometric measurements, thus a new value for the absolute magnitude is H = 24.29 mag. We note that the G = 0.2 obtained from our fit is close to the average value of 0.24 derived for S-type asteroids (Warner et al 2009). It is difficult to estimate the accuracy of the H value, so we assume the maximum systematic uncertainty of H to be 0.5 mag, thus the absolute magnitude for 2014 NL52 becomes H = 24.3 ± 0.5 mag.…”
Section: Phase Curve and Sizesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason we belive the phase curve should be shifted downwards by about 0.45 mag, so that it coincides with our photometric measurements, thus a new value for the absolute magnitude is H = 24.29 mag. We note that the G = 0.2 obtained from our fit is close to the average value of 0.24 derived for S-type asteroids (Warner et al 2009). It is difficult to estimate the accuracy of the H value, so we assume the maximum systematic uncertainty of H to be 0.5 mag, thus the absolute magnitude for 2014 NL52 becomes H = 24.3 ± 0.5 mag.…”
Section: Phase Curve and Sizesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All lightcurves simulated at α = 58 • and A = 0.6 mag had two maxima and two minima per period. This let us believe the P 2 solution represents the true period of 2014 NL52 so that we assign it a reliability code U = 2+ (Warner et al 2009). We did not attempt to fold the 20 and 29 July data because the 3σ uncertainty in the derived synodic period, after 9 days, would lead to the uncertainty in the rotation phase as large as 6 rotations.…”
Section: Rotation Periodmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Statistical considerations in this section are based on the Minor Planer Center Lightcurve Database (LCDB, Warner et al 2009Warner et al , updated 2016 September 5) using a sample of the ∼1200 brightest main belt asteroids (those with absolute magnitudes H≤11 mag, Fig. 1), 1 which translates to diameters down to 12-37 km, depending on albedo (after MPC conversion table 2 ).…”
Section: Observing and Modelling Biases In Asteroid Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the colour derived from the reflectance spectra and the observing geometry of the observations, we measure an absolute magnitude of H V = 14.30±0.08 for asteroid 7343. A G-value (Bowell et al 1989) of 0.24 ± 0.11 was used, typical for S-type asteroids (Warner et al 2009). The large uncertainty in the absolute magnitude is dominated by the uncertainty in the G-value used.…”
Section: Lightcurve Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%