2021
DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_679_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of psychological well-being and fertility intention in parents of children with intellectual disability

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Childbearing is an important event in a couple's life. The parents might have children with disability that affected on their well-being after the children's birth. Well-being considered as an important aspect of a couple's quality of life which may alter the future of their fertility. The present study was conducted to the association of psychological well-being and fertility intention in parents with educable intellectually disabled children. METHODS: Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interviewer did not know most of the participants before the study, and the lack of previous rapport could have affected the extent the participants were willing to share details of events or provide deeper reflections on their psyche and thought processes. [ 29 30 ] Second, this study was conducted only among PLHIV in monogamous marriage or cohabitation who did not identify as LGBTQIA+, and thus, the study findings may not be generalizable to those in more casual or less heteronormative relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviewer did not know most of the participants before the study, and the lack of previous rapport could have affected the extent the participants were willing to share details of events or provide deeper reflections on their psyche and thought processes. [ 29 30 ] Second, this study was conducted only among PLHIV in monogamous marriage or cohabitation who did not identify as LGBTQIA+, and thus, the study findings may not be generalizable to those in more casual or less heteronormative relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%